| Submitter | Kevin Wolf |
|---|---|
| Date | Jan. 20, 2010, 2:03 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1263996186-6623-9-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/43292/ |
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Comments
Patch
diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c index a84620f..da7d3f2 100644 --- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c +++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c @@ -284,8 +284,12 @@ static int update_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs, printf("update_refcount: offset=%" PRId64 " size=%" PRId64 " addend=%d\n", offset, length, addend); #endif - if (length <= 0) + if (length < 0) { return -EINVAL; + } else if (length == 0) { + return 0; + } + start = offset & ~(s->cluster_size - 1); last = (offset + length - 1) & ~(s->cluster_size - 1); for(cluster_offset = start; cluster_offset <= last;
There's absolutely no problem with updating the refcounts of 0 clusters. At least snapshot code is doing this and would fail once the result of update_refcount isn't ignored any more. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> --- block/qcow2-refcount.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)