| Message ID | 20141204203903.GC10059@birch.djwong.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:39:03PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > When we're rechecking an inode checksum failure, we need to force the > inode to be re-read from disk so that the verification routine runs, > so drop the stashed inode. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Applied, thanks. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c index 82792e4..0073bed 100644 --- a/e2fsck/pass1.c +++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c @@ -671,6 +671,7 @@ static errcode_t recheck_bad_inode_checksum(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino, * Reread inode. If we don't see checksum error, then this inode * has been fixed elsewhere. */ + ctx->stashed_ino = 0; retval = ext2fs_read_inode_full(fs, ino, (struct ext2_inode *)&inode, sizeof(inode)); if (retval && retval != EXT2_ET_INODE_CSUM_INVALID)
When we're rechecking an inode checksum failure, we need to force the inode to be re-read from disk so that the verification routine runs, so drop the stashed inode. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> --- e2fsck/pass1.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html