Message ID | 1417537711-15608-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 17:28:31 Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > The following changes since commit 0df1f2487d2f0d04703f142813d53615d62a1da4: > > Linux 3.18-rc3 (2014-11-02 15:01:51 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git tags/at91-defconfig > > for you to fetch changes up to 4cd275f762a21cf21768e327873ba2883c839281: > > ARM: at91/defconfig: add DM9000 to at91_dt (2014-12-01 16:30:00 +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > First batch of defconfigs for AT91 / 3.19: > - use NEON for all C-A5, neon code handles the !NEON case > - add new XDMA driver > - add some useful drivers as we only have a single defconfig for all > AT91SAM9/RM9200 I just noticed that this is based on -rc3, while the next/defconfig branch so far is based on -rc1. If you don't mind, could you rebase your branch on -rc1 as well and send it again so I can avoid the backmerge? Thanks, Arnd
Le 04/12/2014 17:28, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Tuesday 02 December 2014 17:28:31 Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> >> The following changes since commit 0df1f2487d2f0d04703f142813d53615d62a1da4: >> >> Linux 3.18-rc3 (2014-11-02 15:01:51 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git tags/at91-defconfig >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 4cd275f762a21cf21768e327873ba2883c839281: >> >> ARM: at91/defconfig: add DM9000 to at91_dt (2014-12-01 16:30:00 +0100) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> First batch of defconfigs for AT91 / 3.19: >> - use NEON for all C-A5, neon code handles the !NEON case >> - add new XDMA driver >> - add some useful drivers as we only have a single defconfig for all >> AT91SAM9/RM9200 > > I just noticed that this is based on -rc3, while the next/defconfig branch > so far is based on -rc1. If you don't mind, could you rebase your > branch on -rc1 as well and send it again so I can avoid the backmerge? Sure, I do it right now. Stay tuned ;-) Bye,