@@ -7,6 +7,57 @@
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("wmb": : :"memory")
+/**
+ * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
+ * depend on.
+ *
+ * No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
+ * over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
+ * to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
+ * reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
+ * any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
+ * rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
+ * rmb().
+ *
+ * These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
+ * and the compiler.
+ *
+ * Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
+ * not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
+ * memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
+ *
+ * For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
+ * value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
+ *
+ * <programlisting>
+ * CPU 0 CPU 1
+ *
+ * b = 2;
+ * memory_barrier();
+ * p = &b; q = p;
+ * read_barrier_depends();
+ * d = *q;
+ * </programlisting>
+ *
+ * because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
+ * two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
+ * the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
+ *
+ * <programlisting>
+ * CPU 0 CPU 1
+ *
+ * a = 2;
+ * memory_barrier();
+ * b = 3; y = b;
+ * read_barrier_depends();
+ * x = a;
+ * </programlisting>
+ *
+ * does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
+ * the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
+ * as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
+ * in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
+ */
#define read_barrier_depends() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -22,6 +22,57 @@
# define mb() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); smp_mark_barrier(); } while (0)
# define rmb() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); } while (0)
# define wmb() do { barrier(); smp_mark_barrier(); } while (0)
+/*
+ * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
+ * depend on.
+ *
+ * No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
+ * over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
+ * to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
+ * reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
+ * any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
+ * rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
+ * rmb().
+ *
+ * These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
+ * and the compiler.
+ *
+ * Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
+ * not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
+ * memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
+ *
+ * For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
+ * value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
+ *
+ * <programlisting>
+ * CPU 0 CPU 1
+ *
+ * b = 2;
+ * memory_barrier();
+ * p = &b; q = p;
+ * read_barrier_depends();
+ * d = *q;
+ * </programlisting>
+ *
+ * because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
+ * two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
+ * the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
+ *
+ * <programlisting>
+ * CPU 0 CPU 1
+ *
+ * a = 2;
+ * memory_barrier();
+ * b = 3; y = b;
+ * read_barrier_depends();
+ * x = a;
+ * </programlisting>
+ *
+ * does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
+ * the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
+ * as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
+ * in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
+ */
# define read_barrier_depends() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); } while (0)
#endif
@@ -35,26 +35,22 @@
* it's (presumably) much slower than mf and (b) mf.a is supported for
* sequential memory pages only.
*/
-#define mb() ia64_mf()
-#define rmb() mb()
-#define wmb() mb()
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
+#define mb() ia64_mf()
+#define rmb() mb()
+#define wmb() mb()
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
# define smp_mb() mb()
-# define smp_rmb() rmb()
-# define smp_wmb() wmb()
-# define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
-
#else
-
# define smp_mb() barrier()
-# define smp_rmb() barrier()
-# define smp_wmb() barrier()
-# define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
-
#endif
+#define smp_rmb() smp_mb()
+#define smp_wmb() smp_mb()
+
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
#define smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier()
#define smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier()
@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ static inline void wmb(void)
wr_fence();
}
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
-
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
#define fence() do { } while (0)
#define smp_mb() barrier()
@@ -82,7 +80,10 @@ static inline void fence(void)
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#endif
#endif
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
@@ -10,58 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/addrspace.h>
-/*
- * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
- * depend on.
- *
- * No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
- * over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
- * to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
- * reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
- * any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
- * rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
- * rmb().
- *
- * These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
- * and the compiler.
- *
- * Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
- * not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
- * memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
- *
- * For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
- * value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * b = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * p = &b; q = p;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * d = *q;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
- * two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
- * the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * a = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * b = 3; y = b;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * x = a;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
- * the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
- * as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
- * in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
- */
-
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
#define mb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
@@ -50,16 +49,17 @@
#define smp_mb() mb()
#define smp_rmb() __lwsync()
#define smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#else
#define __lwsync() barrier()
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
/*
* This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
* started until the value of the argument x is known. For example, if
@@ -24,11 +24,12 @@
#define rmb() mb()
#define wmb() mb()
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define smp_mb() mb()
#define smp_rmb() rmb()
#define smp_wmb() wmb()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
+
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
#define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define set_mb(__var, __value) \
do { __var = __value; membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
@@ -51,7 +50,8 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
#define smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
#endif
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
do { \
@@ -24,60 +24,6 @@
#define wmb() asm volatile("sfence" ::: "memory")
#endif
-/**
- * read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
- * depend on.
- *
- * No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
- * over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
- * to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
- * reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
- * any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
- * rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
- * rmb().
- *
- * These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
- * and the compiler.
- *
- * Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
- * not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
- * memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
- *
- * For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
- * value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * b = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * p = &b; q = p;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * d = *q;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
- * two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
- * the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
- *
- * <programlisting>
- * CPU 0 CPU 1
- *
- * a = 2;
- * memory_barrier();
- * b = 3; y = b;
- * read_barrier_depends();
- * x = a;
- * </programlisting>
- *
- * does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
- * the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
- * as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
- * in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
- **/
-
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define smp_mb() mb()
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE
@@ -86,16 +32,17 @@
# define smp_rmb() barrier()
#endif
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
#else /* !SMP */
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
#endif /* SMP */
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
/*
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
-#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define smp_mb() mb()
@@ -42,7 +40,6 @@
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -50,11 +47,13 @@
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
+
/*
* Stop RDTSC speculation. This is needed when you need to use RDTSC
* (or get_cycles or vread that possibly accesses the TSC) in a defined
This patch is meant to cleanup the handling of read_barrier_depends and smp_read_barrier_depends. In multiple spots in the kernel headers read_barrier_depends is defined as "do {} while (0)", however we then go into the SMP vs non-SMP sections and have the SMP version reference read_barrier_depends, and the non-SMP define it as yet another empty do/while. With this commit I went through and cleaned out the duplicate definitions and reduced the number of definitions down to 2 per header. In addition I moved the 50 line comments for the macro from the x86 and mips headers that defined it as an empty do/while to those that were actually defining the macro, alpha and blackfin. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> --- arch/alpha/include/asm/barrier.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/blackfin/include/asm/barrier.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h | 22 +++++-------- arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h | 7 ++-- arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h | 52 ------------------------------- arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h | 6 ++-- arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 5 ++- arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 59 ++--------------------------------- arch/x86/um/asm/barrier.h | 7 ++-- 10 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html