| Message ID | 1416519221-22299-10-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c index b951320..cfd49f0 100644 --- a/kvm-all.c +++ b/kvm-all.c @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_assign_irqfd(KVMState *s, int fd, int rfd, int virq, int kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route(KVMState *s, AdapterInfo *adapter) { - struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute; + struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute = {}; int virq; if (!kvm_gsi_routing_enabled()) {
Paolo Bonzini reported that Coverity reports an uninitialized pad value. Let's use a designated initializer for kvm_irq_routing_entry to avoid this false positive. This is similar to kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route and other users of kvm_irq_routing_entry. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> --- kvm-all.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)