From patchwork Sun Oct 12 05:46:34 2008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mutex: optimise generic mutex implementations Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:46:34 -0000 From: Nick Piggin X-Patchwork-Id: 4047 Message-Id: <20081012054634.GA12535@wotan.suse.de> To: Ingo Molnar , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org Speed up generic mutex implementations. - atomic operations which both modify the variable and return something imply full smp memory barriers before and after the memory operations involved (failing atomic_cmpxchg, atomic_add_unless, etc don't imply a barrier because they don't modify the target). See Documentation/atomic_ops.txt. So remove extra barriers and branches. - All architectures support atomic_cmpxchg. This has no relation to __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG. We can just take the atomic_cmpxchg path unconditionally This reduces a simple single threaded fastpath lock+unlock test from 590 cycles to 203 cycles on a ppc970 system. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: David Howells --- Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, v { if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0)) fail_fn(count); - else - smp_mb(); } /** @@ -41,10 +39,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *c { if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0)) return fail_fn(count); - else { - smp_mb(); - return 0; - } + return 0; } /** @@ -63,7 +58,6 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *c static inline void __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - smp_mb(); if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -98,15 +92,9 @@ __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count * just as efficient (and simpler) as a 'destructive' probing of * the mutex state would be. */ -#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG - if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1)) { - smp_mb(); + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1)) return 1; - } return 0; -#else - return fail_fn(count); -#endif } #endif Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, v { if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) fail_fn(count); - else - smp_mb(); } /** @@ -46,10 +44,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *c { if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) return fail_fn(count); - else { - smp_mb(); - return 0; - } + return 0; } /** @@ -67,7 +62,6 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *c static inline void __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - smp_mb(); if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -110,7 +104,6 @@ __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count if (prev < 0) prev = 0; } - smp_mb(); return prev; }