diff mbox

[3/3,RPC] kvm: extend kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route to work on s390

Message ID 1413990720-39602-4-git-send-email-blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Frank Blaschka Oct. 22, 2014, 3:12 p.m. UTC
From: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>

on s390 MSI-X irqs are presented as thin or adapter interrupts
for this we have to reorganize the routing entry to contain
valid information for the adapter interrupt code on s390.
To minimize impact on existing code we introduce an architecture
function to fixup the routing entry.

Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
---
 include/sysemu/kvm.h |  4 ++++
 kvm-all.c            |  2 ++
 target-arm/kvm.c     |  5 +++++
 target-i386/kvm.c    |  5 +++++
 target-mips/kvm.c    |  5 +++++
 target-ppc/kvm.c     |  5 +++++
 target-s390x/kvm.c   | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 51 insertions(+)

Comments

Cornelia Huck Oct. 30, 2014, 5:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:12:00 +0200
Frank Blaschka <blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
> 
> on s390 MSI-X irqs are presented as thin or adapter interrupts
> for this we have to reorganize the routing entry to contain
> valid information for the adapter interrupt code on s390.
> To minimize impact on existing code we introduce an architecture
> function to fixup the routing entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  4 ++++
>  kvm-all.c            |  2 ++
>  target-arm/kvm.c     |  5 +++++
>  target-i386/kvm.c    |  5 +++++
>  target-mips/kvm.c    |  5 +++++
>  target-ppc/kvm.c     |  5 +++++
>  target-s390x/kvm.c   | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> 

> diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c
> index 9280132..c3b3b0f 100644
> --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include "trace.h"
>  #include "qapi-event.h"
>  #include "pci_ic.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h"
> 
>  /* #define DEBUG_KVM */
> 
> @@ -1639,3 +1640,27 @@ int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(S390MachineProps *prop)
>  {
>      return cpu_model_get(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE, (uint64_t) prop);
>  }
> +
> +void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
> +                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
> +{
> +    S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev;
> +    uint32_t fid = data >> ZPCI_MSI_VEC_BITS;
> +    uint32_t vec = data & ZPCI_MSI_VEC_MASK;

I think this needs a comment so it is easier to understand why you're
mucking around with PCI devices and I/O adapters here without referring
to git blame :)

> +
> +    pbdev = s390_pci_find_dev_by_fid(fid);
> +    if (!pbdev) {
> +        DPRINTF("add_msi_route no dev\n");
> +        return;

This feels wrong. Shouldn't this function fail if you can't find the
pci device? The calling function can probably just release the virq
again and return an error.

> +    }
> +
> +    pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_offset = vec;
> +
> +    route->type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER;
> +    route->flags = 0;
> +    route->u.adapter.summary_addr = pbdev->routes.adapter.summary_addr;
> +    route->u.adapter.ind_addr = pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_addr;
> +    route->u.adapter.summary_offset = pbdev->routes.adapter.summary_offset;
> +    route->u.adapter.ind_offset = pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_offset;
> +    route->u.adapter.adapter_id = pbdev->routes.adapter.adapter_id;
> +}
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index 77ee240..d4c89c3 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@  extern bool kvm_readonly_mem_allowed;
 
 struct kvm_run;
 struct kvm_lapic_state;
+struct kvm_irq_routing_entry;
 
 typedef struct KVMCapabilityInfo {
     const char *name;
@@ -261,6 +262,9 @@  int kvm_arch_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr);
 
 void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
 
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data);
+
 int kvm_set_irq(KVMState *s, int irq, int level);
 int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg);
 
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 682420b..965c888 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1198,6 +1198,7 @@  int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
     kroute.u.msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
     kroute.u.msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
     kroute.u.msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
+    kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(&kroute, msg.address, msg.data);
 
     kvm_add_routing_entry(s, &kroute);
     kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(s);
@@ -1223,6 +1224,7 @@  int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg)
     kroute.u.msi.address_lo = (uint32_t)msg.address;
     kroute.u.msi.address_hi = msg.address >> 32;
     kroute.u.msi.data = le32_to_cpu(msg.data);
+    kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(&kroute, msg.address, msg.data);
 
     return kvm_update_routing_entry(s, &kroute);
 }
diff --git a/target-arm/kvm.c b/target-arm/kvm.c
index 319784d..5204c48 100644
--- a/target-arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target-arm/kvm.c
@@ -441,3 +441,8 @@  int kvm_arch_irqchip_create(KVMState *s)
 
     return 0;
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
+{
+}
diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
index ddedc73..5e80ecd 100644
--- a/target-i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
@@ -2688,3 +2688,8 @@  int kvm_device_msix_deassign(KVMState *s, uint32_t dev_id)
     return kvm_deassign_irq_internal(s, dev_id, KVM_DEV_IRQ_GUEST_MSIX |
                                                 KVM_DEV_IRQ_HOST_MSIX);
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
+{
+}
diff --git a/target-mips/kvm.c b/target-mips/kvm.c
index 97fd51a..fe34eb2 100644
--- a/target-mips/kvm.c
+++ b/target-mips/kvm.c
@@ -688,3 +688,8 @@  int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
 
     return ret;
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
+{
+}
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index 9c23c6b..55627b9 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -2388,3 +2388,8 @@  out_close:
 error_out:
     return;
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
+{
+}
diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c
index 9280132..c3b3b0f 100644
--- a/target-s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ 
 #include "trace.h"
 #include "qapi-event.h"
 #include "pci_ic.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h"
 
 /* #define DEBUG_KVM */
 
@@ -1639,3 +1640,27 @@  int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(S390MachineProps *prop)
 {
     return cpu_model_get(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE, (uint64_t) prop);
 }
+
+void kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
+                              uint64_t address, uint32_t data)
+{
+    S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev;
+    uint32_t fid = data >> ZPCI_MSI_VEC_BITS;
+    uint32_t vec = data & ZPCI_MSI_VEC_MASK;
+
+    pbdev = s390_pci_find_dev_by_fid(fid);
+    if (!pbdev) {
+        DPRINTF("add_msi_route no dev\n");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_offset = vec;
+
+    route->type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER;
+    route->flags = 0;
+    route->u.adapter.summary_addr = pbdev->routes.adapter.summary_addr;
+    route->u.adapter.ind_addr = pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_addr;
+    route->u.adapter.summary_offset = pbdev->routes.adapter.summary_offset;
+    route->u.adapter.ind_offset = pbdev->routes.adapter.ind_offset;
+    route->u.adapter.adapter_id = pbdev->routes.adapter.adapter_id;
+}