Message ID | 20141002135926.GC27230@titan.lakedaemon.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thursday 02 October 2014 09:59:26 Jason Cooper wrote: > > I know this is way late, but the changes a fairly small, and have been > in linux-next for at least 9 of Stephen's 'next-YYYYMMDD' tags. > Hopefully the merge window opening a week late will make it possible for > you guys to take this. > > This is an incremental pull request from tags/mvebu-dt-3.18 up to > tags/mvebu-dt-3.18-2 on the mvebu/dt branch. The one patch is a bug fix, so it's exempt from the deadline, the other one is obviously harmless, so I'm pulling it into next/dt. Regarding the DT change: Seriously? They made the same mistake *AGAIN*? I hope that whoever at Marvell decided to change the register location for a shipping product in a boot loader update will lose their commit access. Arnd
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:20:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2014 09:59:26 Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > I know this is way late, but the changes a fairly small, and have been > > in linux-next for at least 9 of Stephen's 'next-YYYYMMDD' tags. > > Hopefully the merge window opening a week late will make it possible for > > you guys to take this. > > > > This is an incremental pull request from tags/mvebu-dt-3.18 up to > > tags/mvebu-dt-3.18-2 on the mvebu/dt branch. > > The one patch is a bug fix, so it's exempt from the deadline, the other > one is obviously harmless, so I'm pulling it into next/dt. Thanks! > Regarding the DT change: Seriously? They made the same mistake > *AGAIN*? I hope that whoever at Marvell decided to change the > register location for a shipping product in a boot loader update > will lose their commit access. You're assuming they use version control. I wouldn't give them that much credit. ;-) thx, Jason.