@@ -99,8 +99,7 @@ static void check_inode_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx)
return;
nbytes = (size_t)(EXT2_INODES_PER_GROUP(ctx->fs->super) / 8);
- retval = ext2fs_get_memalign(ctx->fs->blocksize, ctx->fs->blocksize,
- &buf);
+ retval = ext2fs_get_mem(ctx->fs->blocksize, &buf);
if (retval) {
com_err(ctx->program_name, 0, "%s",
_("check_inode_bitmap_checksum: Memory allocation error"));
@@ -155,8 +154,7 @@ static void check_block_bitmap_checksum(e2fsck_t ctx)
return;
nbytes = (size_t)(EXT2_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(ctx->fs->super) / 8);
- retval = ext2fs_get_memalign(ctx->fs->blocksize, ctx->fs->blocksize,
- &buf);
+ retval = ext2fs_get_mem(ctx->fs->blocksize, &buf);
if (retval) {
com_err(ctx->program_name, 0, "%s",
_("check_block_bitmap_checksum: Memory allocation error"));
There is no reason to request a aligned buffer in check_{inode,block}_bitmap, and this will cause failures for dietlibc, which doesn't have support for posix_memalign() or any other way to request an aligned memory allocation. Fortunately, this is only needed in very few places where direct I/O is required. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> --- e2fsck/pass5.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)