Message ID | alpine.LFD.2.03.1409161654370.25290@solarflare.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On 16/09/14 17:57, Edward Cree wrote: > Reported by Nikolay Aleksandrov. In efx_init_port() we call > efx_mac_reconfigure() to work around a Falcon/A1 limitation, and this calls > efx_{arch}_filter_sync_rx_mode(), which takes the addr_list_lock; but this > lock is uninitialised, because we haven't called register_netdevice() yet. > So, in efx_farch_filter_sync_rx_mode(), check efx_dev_registered() before > doing anything else. > The EF10 equivalent, efx_ef10_filter_sync_rx_mode(), already has the > corresponding check. > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c > index 0537381..6859437 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c > @@ -2933,6 +2933,9 @@ void efx_farch_filter_sync_rx_mode(struct efx_nic *efx) > u32 crc; > int bit; > > + if (!efx_dev_registered(efx)) > + return; > + > netif_addr_lock_bh(net_dev); > > efx->unicast_filter = !(net_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC); > You should add a Signed-off-by, otherwise looks good to me. FWIW, you can add my Tested-by as well. Tested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c index 0537381..6859437 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c @@ -2933,6 +2933,9 @@ void efx_farch_filter_sync_rx_mode(struct efx_nic *efx) u32 crc; int bit; + if (!efx_dev_registered(efx)) + return; + netif_addr_lock_bh(net_dev); efx->unicast_filter = !(net_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC);