@@ -3101,7 +3101,6 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
struct slave *slave;
/* reset slave->backup and slave->inactive */
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
if (bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
@@ -3116,7 +3115,6 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
}
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
}
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
bond_work_init_all(bond);
@@ -3171,7 +3169,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *bond_get_stats(struct net_device *bond_dev,
memset(stats, 0, sizeof(*stats));
- read_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *sstats =
dev_get_stats(slave->dev, &temp);
@@ -3202,7 +3199,6 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *bond_get_stats(struct net_device *bond_dev,
stats->tx_heartbeat_errors += sstats->tx_heartbeat_errors;
stats->tx_window_errors += sstats->tx_window_errors;
}
- read_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
return stats;
}
@@ -3242,13 +3238,11 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
if (mii->reg_num == 1) {
mii->val_out = 0;
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
if (netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev))
mii->val_out = BMSR_LSTATUS;
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
}
return 0;
@@ -3424,21 +3418,6 @@ static int bond_change_mtu(struct net_device *bond_dev, int new_mtu)
netdev_dbg(bond_dev, "bond=%p, new_mtu=%d\n", bond, new_mtu);
- /* Can't hold bond->lock with bh disabled here since
- * some base drivers panic. On the other hand we can't
- * hold bond->lock without bh disabled because we'll
- * deadlock. The only solution is to rely on the fact
- * that we're under rtnl_lock here, and the slaves
- * list won't change. This doesn't solve the problem
- * of setting the slave's MTU while it is
- * transmitting, but the assumption is that the base
- * driver can handle that.
- *
- * TODO: figure out a way to safely iterate the slaves
- * list, but without holding a lock around the actual
- * call to the base driver.
- */
-
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
netdev_dbg(bond_dev, "s %p c_m %p\n",
slave, slave->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_change_mtu);
@@ -3513,21 +3492,6 @@ static int bond_set_mac_address(struct net_device *bond_dev, void *addr)
if (!is_valid_ether_addr(sa->sa_data))
return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
- /* Can't hold bond->lock with bh disabled here since
- * some base drivers panic. On the other hand we can't
- * hold bond->lock without bh disabled because we'll
- * deadlock. The only solution is to rely on the fact
- * that we're under rtnl_lock here, and the slaves
- * list won't change. This doesn't solve the problem
- * of setting the slave's hw address while it is
- * transmitting, but the assumption is that the base
- * driver can handle that.
- *
- * TODO: figure out a way to safely iterate the slaves
- * list, but without holding a lock around the actual
- * call to the base driver.
- */
-
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
netdev_dbg(bond_dev, "slave %p %s\n", slave, slave->dev->name);
res = dev_set_mac_address(slave->dev, addr);
@@ -3853,7 +3817,6 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_settings(struct net_device *bond_dev,
* the true receive or transmit bandwidth (not all modes are symmetric)
* this is an accurate maximum.
*/
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
if (bond_slave_can_tx(slave)) {
if (slave->speed != SPEED_UNKNOWN)
@@ -3864,7 +3827,6 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_settings(struct net_device *bond_dev,
}
}
ethtool_cmd_speed_set(ecmd, speed ? : SPEED_UNKNOWN);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -3927,7 +3889,6 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
/* initialize rwlocks */
- rwlock_init(&bond->lock);
rwlock_init(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
bond->params = bonding_defaults;
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
* @pos: current slave
* @iter: list_head * iterator
*
- * Caller must hold bond->lock
+ * Caller must hold RTNL
*/
#define bond_for_each_slave(bond, pos, iter) \
netdev_for_each_lower_private((bond)->dev, pos, iter)
@@ -185,11 +185,8 @@ struct slave {
/*
* Here are the locking policies for the two bonding locks:
*
- * 1) Get bond->lock when reading/writing slave list.
+ * 1) Get rcu_read_lock when reading or RTNL when writing slave list.
* 2) Get bond->curr_slave_lock when reading/writing bond->curr_active_slave.
- * (It is unnecessary when the write-lock is put with bond->lock.)
- * 3) When we lock with bond->curr_slave_lock, we must lock with bond->lock
- * beforehand.
*/
struct bonding {
struct net_device *dev; /* first - useful for panic debug */
@@ -200,7 +197,6 @@ struct bonding {
s32 slave_cnt; /* never change this value outside the attach/detach wrappers */
int (*recv_probe)(const struct sk_buff *, struct bonding *,
struct slave *);
- rwlock_t lock;
rwlock_t curr_slave_lock;
u8 send_peer_notif;
u8 igmp_retrans;
The usage of bond->lock in bond_main.c was completely unnecessary as it didn't help to sync with anything, most of the spots already had RTNL. Since there're no more users of bond->lock, remove it. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 39 --------------------------------------- drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 8 ++------ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)