[1/1] sctp: not send SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE notifications with failed probe

Since the transport has always been in state SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, it
therefore wasn't active before and hasn't been used before, and it
always has been, so it is unnecessary to bug the user with a 
notification.

Reported-by: Deepak Khandelwal <khandelwal.deepak.1987@gmail.com>  
Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> 
Suggested-by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com>
---
 net/sctp/associola.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

On 08/20/2014 05:31 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> Since the transport has always been in state SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, it
> therefore wasn't active before and hasn't been used before, and it
> always has been, so it is unnecessary to bug the user with a 
> notification.
> 
> Reported-by: Deepak Khandelwal <khandelwal.deepak.1987@gmail.com>  
> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com>

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

Thanks
-vlad
> ---
>  net/sctp/associola.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 9de23a2..2e23f6b 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ void sctp_assoc_control_transport(struct sctp_association *asoc,
>  		else {
>  			dst_release(transport->dst);
>  			transport->dst = NULL;
> +			ulp_notify = false;
>  		}
>  
>  		spc_state = SCTP_ADDR_UNREACHABLE;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

On 08/20/2014 11:31 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> Since the transport has always been in state SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, it
> therefore wasn't active before and hasn't been used before, and it
> always has been, so it is unnecessary to bug the user with a
> notification.
>
> Reported-by: Deepak Khandelwal <khandelwal.deepak.1987@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com>

Looks a bit better, thanks!

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:31:43 +0800

> Since the transport has always been in state SCTP_UNCONFIRMED, it
> therefore wasn't active before and hasn't been used before, and it
> always has been, so it is unnecessary to bug the user with a 
> notification.
> 
> Reported-by: Deepak Khandelwal <khandelwal.deepak.1987@gmail.com>  
> Suggested-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> 
> Suggested-by: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html