| Message ID | 000a01cfb224$0ebb81d0$2c328570$@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for > many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto > option combinations on targets like ARM, the generated pr61772.s may only > contain lto object content, rather than assembly codes. The scanning check > is failed in these cases. > I think disabling lto won't weaken the test since what it tests has nothing > to do with lto. This patch fixes these failures by disabling lto. > > Is it OK? Ok. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > bin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > 2014-08-07 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> > > * gcc.dg/torture/pr61772.c: Skip lto running.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr61772.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr61772.c (revision 213529) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr61772.c (working copy) @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-flto" } { "" } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "XXX" 2 } } */ static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int dec_and_test (int *i)