@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ enum {
EC_FLAGS_BLOCKED, /* Transactions are blocked */
};
+#define ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL 0x01 /* Available for command byte */
+#define ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE 0x02 /* Completed last byte */
+
/* ec.c is compiled in acpi namespace so this shows up as acpi.ec_delay param */
static unsigned int ec_delay __read_mostly = ACPI_EC_DELAY;
module_param(ec_delay, uint, 0644);
@@ -114,7 +117,7 @@ struct transaction {
u8 ri;
u8 wlen;
u8 rlen;
- bool done;
+ u8 flags;
};
struct acpi_ec *boot_ec, *first_ec;
@@ -155,63 +158,68 @@ static inline void acpi_ec_write_data(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 data)
outb(data, ec->data_addr);
}
-static int ec_transaction_done(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+static int ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
- if (!ec->curr || ec->curr->done)
+ if (!ec->curr || (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE))
ret = 1;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
return ret;
}
-static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
-{
- ec->curr->irq_count = ec->curr->wi = ec->curr->ri = 0;
- ec->curr->done = false;
- acpi_ec_write_cmd(ec, ec->curr->command);
-}
-
static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct transaction *t;
u8 status;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
pr_debug("===== %s =====\n", in_interrupt() ? "IRQ" : "TASK");
status = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
t = ec->curr;
if (!t)
- goto unlock;
- if (t->wlen > t->wi) {
- if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
- acpi_ec_write_data(ec,
- t->wdata[t->wi++]);
- else
- goto err;
- } else if (t->rlen > t->ri) {
- if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF) == 1) {
- t->rdata[t->ri++] = acpi_ec_read_data(ec);
- if (t->rlen == t->ri)
- t->done = true;
+ goto err;
+ if (t->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL) {
+ if (t->wlen > t->wi) {
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
+ acpi_ec_write_data(ec, t->wdata[t->wi++]);
+ else
+ goto err;
+ } else if (t->rlen > t->ri) {
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_OBF) == 1) {
+ t->rdata[t->ri++] = acpi_ec_read_data(ec);
+ if (t->rlen == t->ri)
+ t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE;
+ } else
+ goto err;
+ } else if (t->wlen == t->wi &&
+ (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
+ t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE;
+ return;
+ } else {
+ if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
+ acpi_ec_write_cmd(ec, t->command);
+ t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL;
} else
goto err;
- } else if (t->wlen == t->wi &&
- (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0)
- t->done = true;
- goto unlock;
+ return;
+ }
err:
/*
* If SCI bit is set, then don't think it's a false IRQ
* otherwise will take a not handled IRQ as a false one.
*/
- if (in_interrupt() && !(status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI))
- ++t->irq_count;
+ if (!(status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI)) {
+ if (in_interrupt() && t)
+ ++t->irq_count;
+ }
+}
-unlock:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ ec->curr->irq_count = ec->curr->wi = ec->curr->ri = 0;
+ ec->curr->flags = 0;
+ advance_transaction(ec);
}
static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data);
@@ -236,15 +244,17 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
/* don't sleep with disabled interrupts */
if (EC_FLAGS_MSI || irqs_disabled()) {
udelay(ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY);
- if (ec_transaction_done(ec))
+ if (ec_transaction_completed(ec))
return 0;
} else {
if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait,
- ec_transaction_done(ec),
+ ec_transaction_completed(ec),
msecs_to_jiffies(1)))
return 0;
}
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
advance_transaction(ec);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
} while (time_before(jiffies, delay));
pr_debug("controller reset, restart transaction\n");
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
@@ -663,10 +673,13 @@ static int ec_check_sci(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 state)
static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device,
u32 gpe_number, void *data)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct acpi_ec *ec = data;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
advance_transaction(ec);
- if (ec_transaction_done(ec) &&
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+ if (ec_transaction_completed(ec) &&
(acpi_ec_read_status(ec) & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) {
wake_up(&ec->wait);
ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec));
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled ACPI / EC: Add asynchronous command byte write support to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y.z extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.13.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.13.11.6. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.13.y.z tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Kamal ------ From 631bdb91628b0afe6e1dca038811aa8f3f690f1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:41:35 +0800 Subject: ACPI / EC: Add asynchronous command byte write support commit f92fca0060fc4dc9227342d0072d75df98c1e5a5 upstream. Move the first command byte write into advance_transaction() so that all EC register accesses that can affect the command processing state machine can happen in this asynchronous state machine advancement function. The advance_transaction() function then can be a complete implementation of an asyncrhonous transaction for a single command so that: 1. The first command byte can be written in the interrupt context; 2. The command completion waiter can also be used to wait the first command byte's timeout; 3. In BURST mode, the follow-up command bytes can be written in the interrupt context directly, so that it doesn't need to return to the task context. Returning to the task context reduces the throughput of the BURST mode and in the worst cases where the system workload is very high, this leads to the hardware driven automatic BURST mode exit. In order not to increase memory consumption, convert 'done' into 'flags' to contain multiple indications: 1. ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE: converting from original 'done' condition, indicating the completion of the command transaction. 2. ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL: indicating the availability of writing the first command byte. A new command can utilize this flag to compete for the right of accessing the underlying hardware. There is a follow-up bug fix that has utilized this new flag. The 2 flags are important because it also reflects a key concept of IO programs' design used in the system softwares. Normally an IO program running in the kernel should first be implemented in the asynchronous way. And the 2 flags are the most common way to implement its synchronous operations on top of the asynchronous operations: 1. POLL: This flag can be used to block until the asynchronous operations can happen. 2. COMPLETE: This flag can be used to block until the asynchronous operations have completed. By constructing code cleanly in this way, many difficult problems can be solved smoothly. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70891 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63931 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59911 Reported-and-tested-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@garethwilliams.me.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: Hans de Goede <jwrdegoede@fedoraproject.org> Reported-by: Barton Xu <tank.xuhan@gmail.com> Tested-by: Steffen Weber <steffen.weber@gmail.com> Tested-by: Arthur Chen <axchen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1