diff mbox

[PATCHv9,3/3] arm: dts: Add Altera SDRAM controller bindings

Message ID 1406744573-609-4-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

tthayer@opensource.altera.com July 30, 2014, 6:22 p.m. UTC
From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>

Add the Altera SDRAM controller bindings and device tree changes to the Altera SoC project.

Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
---
v2: Changes to SoC SDRAM EDAC code.

v3: Implement code suggestions for SDRAM EDAC code.

v4: Remove syscon from SDRAM controller bindings.

v5: No Change, bump version for consistency.

v6: Only map the ctrlcfg register as syscon.

v7: No change. Bump for consistency.

v8: No change. Bump for consistency.

v9: Changes to support a MFD SDRAM controller with nested EDAC.
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt |   13 +++++++++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi                     |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt

Comments

Rob Herring Aug. 18, 2014, 12:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On 07/30/2014 01:22 PM, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
> 
> Add the Altera SDRAM controller bindings and device tree changes to the Altera SoC project.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
> ---
> v2: Changes to SoC SDRAM EDAC code.
> 
> v3: Implement code suggestions for SDRAM EDAC code.
> 
> v4: Remove syscon from SDRAM controller bindings.
> 
> v5: No Change, bump version for consistency.
> 
> v6: Only map the ctrlcfg register as syscon.
> 
> v7: No change. Bump for consistency.
> 
> v8: No change. Bump for consistency.
> 
> v9: Changes to support a MFD SDRAM controller with nested EDAC.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt |   13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi                     |   10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2bb1ddf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
> +The SDRAM controller is implemented as a MFD so various drivers may
> +nest under this main SDRAM controller binding.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : "altr,sdr";
> +- reg : Should contain 1 register range(address and length)
> +
> +Example:
> +	sdr@0xffc25000 {
> +		compatible = "altr,sdr";
> +		reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> +	};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> index 4676f25..ecb306d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> @@ -603,6 +603,16 @@
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		sdr@0xffc25000 {
> +			compatible = "altr,sdr";
> +			reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> +
> +			sdramedac@0 {
> +				compatible = "altr,sdram-edac";
> +				interrupts = <0 39 4>;
> +			};

This doesn't match the documentation, but I don't think this is a move
in the right direction anyway. Because Linux has/wants an MFD driver is
not a reason to add a sub node. It is a single h/w block and DT should
reflect that.

Rob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
tthayer@opensource.altera.com Aug. 18, 2014, 2:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On 08/17/2014 07:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/30/2014 01:22 PM, tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote:
>> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
>>
>> Add the Altera SDRAM controller bindings and device tree changes to the Altera SoC project.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@opensource.altera.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Changes to SoC SDRAM EDAC code.
>>
>> v3: Implement code suggestions for SDRAM EDAC code.
>>
>> v4: Remove syscon from SDRAM controller bindings.
>>
>> v5: No Change, bump version for consistency.
>>
>> v6: Only map the ctrlcfg register as syscon.
>>
>> v7: No change. Bump for consistency.
>>
>> v8: No change. Bump for consistency.
>>
>> v9: Changes to support a MFD SDRAM controller with nested EDAC.
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt |   13 +++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi                     |   10 ++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..2bb1ddf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
>> +The SDRAM controller is implemented as a MFD so various drivers may
>> +nest under this main SDRAM controller binding.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible : "altr,sdr";
>> +- reg : Should contain 1 register range(address and length)
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +	sdr@0xffc25000 {
>> +		compatible = "altr,sdr";
>> +		reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
>> +	};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
>> index 4676f25..ecb306d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
>> @@ -603,6 +603,16 @@
>>   			};
>>   		};
>>   
>> +		sdr@0xffc25000 {
>> +			compatible = "altr,sdr";
>> +			reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
>> +
>> +			sdramedac@0 {
>> +				compatible = "altr,sdram-edac";
>> +				interrupts = <0 39 4>;
>> +			};
> This doesn't match the documentation, but I don't think this is a move
> in the right direction anyway. Because Linux has/wants an MFD driver is
> not a reason to add a sub node. It is a single h/w block and DT should
> reflect that.
>
> Rob
Hi Rob,

Thanks for reviewing. After discussions with the community and 
internally, I reverted to using the syscon case in revision 10. I 
apologize for the confusion but the syscon method seems to be a cleaner 
solution. I submitted the sycon version on 8/11/14.

Thanks,

Thor

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2bb1ddf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdr.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ 
+Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
+The SDRAM controller is implemented as a MFD so various drivers may
+nest under this main SDRAM controller binding.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible : "altr,sdr";
+- reg : Should contain 1 register range(address and length)
+
+Example:
+	sdr@0xffc25000 {
+		compatible = "altr,sdr";
+		reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
+	};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
index 4676f25..ecb306d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
@@ -603,6 +603,16 @@ 
 			};
 		};
 
+		sdr@0xffc25000 {
+			compatible = "altr,sdr";
+			reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
+
+			sdramedac@0 {
+				compatible = "altr,sdram-edac";
+				interrupts = <0 39 4>;
+			};
+		};
+
 		L2: l2-cache@fffef000 {
 			compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
 			reg = <0xfffef000 0x1000>;