Message ID | 53D1D3F3.1050907@verizon.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 25 July 2014 04:50, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@verizon.net> wrote: > On 03/08/2014 01:33 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 8 March 2014 16:29, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: >>> >>> On 03/08/2014 11:27 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: >>>> >>>> The title says it all. This was just an oversight in the original >>>> patch. >>>> >>>> This could wait until stage 1 obviously. I just wanted to post it. >>>> >>>> There are a lot of post-Issaquah constexpr changes but these will have >>>> to >>>> wait for front-end support for C++14 constexpr. >>>> >>>> Builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux. >>>> >>>> OK? >> >> OK for stage 1, but not now. (And please remember to CC gcc-patches) >> > I had completely forgotten about this until now. > > Rebased, retested, committed. Nice, thanks.
Index: include/experimental/string_view =================================================================== --- include/experimental/string_view (revision 212967) +++ include/experimental/string_view (working copy) @@ -664,22 +664,22 @@ inline namespace string_view_literals { - inline basic_string_view<char> + inline constexpr basic_string_view<char> operator""sv(const char* __str, size_t __len) { return basic_string_view<char>{__str, __len}; } #ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T - inline basic_string_view<wchar_t> + inline constexpr basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator""sv(const wchar_t* __str, size_t __len) { return basic_string_view<wchar_t>{__str, __len}; } #endif #ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 - inline basic_string_view<char16_t> + inline constexpr basic_string_view<char16_t> operator""sv(const char16_t* __str, size_t __len) { return basic_string_view<char16_t>{__str, __len}; } - inline basic_string_view<char32_t> + inline constexpr basic_string_view<char32_t> operator""sv(const char32_t* __str, size_t __len) { return basic_string_view<char32_t>{__str, __len}; } #endif