Message ID | 1406190486-16026-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Stephan, Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann: > From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> > > If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content > so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting force_update > Can you please sign off your (trivial) patch via reply? > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> > --- Thanks, Andreas
On 24.07.2014 14:30, Andreas Färber wrote: > Stephan, > > Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann: >> From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> >> >> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content >> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting force_update >> > > Can you please sign off your (trivial) patch via reply? You mean confirming it was my patch? Yes, it was. Greetings, Stephan
Am 24.07.2014 15:45, schrieb Stephan Kulow: > On 24.07.2014 14:30, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 24.07.2014 10:28, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann: >>> From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@suse.de> >>> >>> If the client asks for !incremental frame updates, it has lost its content >>> so dirty doesn't matter - it has to see the full frame, so setting force_update >>> >> >> Can you please sign off your (trivial) patch via reply? > > You mean confirming it was my patch? Yes, it was. Yes, in the sense of written-by-you - that's expected to be indicated the kernel way through a "Signed-off-by: Your name <your@email>" line, usually automated via git commit -s. Cheers, Andreas
diff --git a/ui/vnc.c b/ui/vnc.c index 548588a..06d6ca0 100644 --- a/ui/vnc.c +++ b/ui/vnc.c @@ -1878,6 +1878,7 @@ static void framebuffer_update_request(VncState *vs, int incremental, return; } + vs->force_update = 1; vnc_set_area_dirty(vs->dirty, width, height, x, y, w, h); }