Message ID | 20140722232552.GJ28323@ld-irv-0074 |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:25:52PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Matt, > > The following changes since commit 9a3c4145af32125c5ee39c0272662b47307a8323: > > Linux 3.16-rc6 (2014-07-20 21:04:16 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://github.com/brcm/linux.git tags/for-3.17/brcmstb > > for you to fetch changes up to 4ba80cbf72940f44fc82067b66221996a20b23f1: > > MAINTAINERS: add entry for Broadcom ARM STB architecture (2014-07-22 16:17:29 -0700) > > Let me know if you'd prefer just Acked/Signed-off-by/Reviewed-by patches > sent to your mailbox instead of git pull reqs. > > I expect these patches to go in through Russel King and through > drivers/power/, so I left them out: > > ARM: Enable erratum 798181 for Broadcom Brahma-B15 > ARM: do CPU-specific init for Broadcom Brahma15 cores > power: reset: Add reboot driver for brcmstb I applied all but "ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support" to mach-bcm for-3.17/[soc|dt]. That patch should also go through Russell. Also, pull requests are fine, but it will help greatly to have pull requests split into the appropriate arm-soc categories next time. I split these into soc and dt as that is how they need to go to the arm-soc team. Thanks, Matt > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > brcmstb platform support, for BCM7xxx STB SoCs > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Brian Norris (2): > ARM: brcmstb: select GISB arbiter and interrupt drivers > MAINTAINERS: add entry for Broadcom ARM STB architecture > > Marc Carino (6): > ARM: brcmstb: add infrastructure for ARM-based Broadcom STB SoCs > ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support > ARM: brcmstb: add CPU binding for Broadcom Brahma15 > ARM: brcmstb: add misc. DT bindings for brcmstb > ARM: brcmstb: gic: add compatible string for Broadcom Brahma15 > ARM: brcmstb: dts: add a reference DTS for Broadcom 7445 > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/brcm-brcmstb.txt | 95 ++++++ > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 + > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 1 + > MAINTAINERS | 8 + > arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 16 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445-bcm97445svmb.dts | 14 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi | 111 +++++++ > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig | 16 + > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile | 5 + > arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.c | 28 ++ > arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.h | 19 ++ > arch/arm/mach-bcm/headsmp-brcmstb.S | 33 ++ > arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp-brcmstb.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 15 files changed, 713 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/brcm-brcmstb.txt > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445-bcm97445svmb.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/brcmstb.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/headsmp-brcmstb.S > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-bcm/platsmp-brcmstb.c
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:31:26AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote: > I applied all but "ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support" > to mach-bcm for-3.17/[soc|dt]. That patch should also go through > Russell. Thanks for the tip. I just submitted the earlyprintk patch to Russel. > Also, pull requests are fine, but it will help greatly to have pull > requests split into the appropriate arm-soc categories next time. I > split these into soc and dt as that is how they need to go to the > arm-soc team. Sure thing. In the future, I may just stick with patches, and you can queue them how you'd like. Is the arm-soc development process documented somewhere? Like an FAQ, or ANNOUNCEMENT? [1] I understand that it's a large and noisy subsystem that warrants some additional processes of its own (beyond what I've seen in other subsystems), but as a relative newcomer to participating in it, I've only been able to glean a few bits of info from searching the LKML/linux-arm-kernel archives. If not, I'm sure I'll figure things out eventually. Thanks, Brian [1] This comes close. At least it captures the history: http://elinux.org/images/a/ad/Arm-soc-checklist.pdf