@@ -1821,7 +1821,7 @@ static const struct rt2x00_ops rt2400pci_ops = {
/*
* RT2400pci module information.
*/
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rt2400pci_device_table) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id rt2400pci_device_table[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0101) },
{ 0, }
};
@@ -2120,7 +2120,7 @@ static const struct rt2x00_ops rt2500pci_ops = {
/*
* RT2500pci module information.
*/
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rt2500pci_device_table) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id rt2500pci_device_table[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0201) },
{ 0, }
};
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static const struct rt2x00_ops rt2800pci_ops = {
/*
* RT2800pci module information.
*/
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rt2800pci_device_table) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id rt2800pci_device_table[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0601) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0681) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0701) },
@@ -3075,7 +3075,7 @@ static const struct rt2x00_ops rt61pci_ops = {
/*
* RT61pci module information.
*/
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(rt61pci_device_table) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id rt61pci_device_table[] = {
/* RT2561s */
{ PCI_DEVICE(0x1814, 0x0301) },
/* RT2561 v2 */
We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch. Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@lip6.fr> --- Tested by compilation without errors. drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2400pci.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2500pci.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c | 2 +- drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html