diff mbox

[1/2] coroutine: make pool size dynamic

Message ID 1404395521-11158-2-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefan Hajnoczi July 3, 2014, 1:52 p.m. UTC
Allow coroutine users to adjust the pool size.  For example, if the
guest has multiple emulated disk drives we should keep around more
coroutines.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 include/block/coroutine.h | 11 +++++++++++
 qemu-coroutine.c          | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Blake July 3, 2014, 1:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On 07/03/2014 07:52 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Allow coroutine users to adjust the pool size.  For example, if the
> guest has multiple emulated disk drives we should keep around more
> coroutines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/block/coroutine.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  qemu-coroutine.c          | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

> +
> +void qemu_coroutine_adjust_pool_size(int n)
> +{
> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&pool_lock);
> +
> +    pool_max_size += n;

Where do you check that this doesn't fall below a bare-minimum
acceptable level? Is it worth assert(pool_max_size >= 64)?
Stefan Hajnoczi July 3, 2014, 6:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 07:52 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Allow coroutine users to adjust the pool size.  For example, if the
>> guest has multiple emulated disk drives we should keep around more
>> coroutines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  include/block/coroutine.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>  qemu-coroutine.c          | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>
>> +
>> +void qemu_coroutine_adjust_pool_size(int n)
>> +{
>> +    qemu_mutex_lock(&pool_lock);
>> +
>> +    pool_max_size += n;
>
> Where do you check that this doesn't fall below a bare-minimum
> acceptable level? Is it worth assert(pool_max_size >= 64)?

I don't.  I think you are right; it's worth checking.

Stefan
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/block/coroutine.h b/include/block/coroutine.h
index a1797ae..07eeb3c 100644
--- a/include/block/coroutine.h
+++ b/include/block/coroutine.h
@@ -223,4 +223,15 @@  void coroutine_fn co_aio_sleep_ns(AioContext *ctx, QEMUClockType type,
  * Note that this function clobbers the handlers for the file descriptor.
  */
 void coroutine_fn yield_until_fd_readable(int fd);
+
+/**
+ * Add or subtract from the coroutine pool size
+ *
+ * The coroutine implementation keeps a pool of coroutines to be reused by
+ * qemu_coroutine_create().  This makes coroutine creation cheap.  Heavy
+ * coroutine users should call this to reserve pool space.  Call it again with
+ * a negative number to release pool space.
+ */
+void qemu_coroutine_adjust_pool_size(int n);
+
 #endif /* QEMU_COROUTINE_H */
diff --git a/qemu-coroutine.c b/qemu-coroutine.c
index 4708521..d94234a 100644
--- a/qemu-coroutine.c
+++ b/qemu-coroutine.c
@@ -18,15 +18,11 @@ 
 #include "block/coroutine.h"
 #include "block/coroutine_int.h"
 
-enum {
-    /* Maximum free pool size prevents holding too many freed coroutines */
-    POOL_MAX_SIZE = 64,
-};
-
 /** Free list to speed up creation */
 static QemuMutex pool_lock;
 static QSLIST_HEAD(, Coroutine) pool = QSLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(pool);
 static unsigned int pool_size;
+static unsigned int pool_max_size = 64;
 
 Coroutine *qemu_coroutine_create(CoroutineEntry *entry)
 {
@@ -55,7 +51,7 @@  static void coroutine_delete(Coroutine *co)
 {
     if (CONFIG_COROUTINE_POOL) {
         qemu_mutex_lock(&pool_lock);
-        if (pool_size < POOL_MAX_SIZE) {
+        if (pool_size < pool_max_size) {
             QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&pool, co, pool_next);
             co->caller = NULL;
             pool_size++;
@@ -137,3 +133,20 @@  void coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_yield(void)
     self->caller = NULL;
     coroutine_swap(self, to);
 }
+
+void qemu_coroutine_adjust_pool_size(int n)
+{
+    qemu_mutex_lock(&pool_lock);
+
+    pool_max_size += n;
+
+    /* Trim oversized pool down to new max */
+    while (pool_size > pool_max_size) {
+        Coroutine *co = QSLIST_FIRST(&pool);
+        QSLIST_REMOVE_HEAD(&pool, pool_next);
+        pool_size--;
+        qemu_coroutine_delete(co);
+    }
+
+    qemu_mutex_unlock(&pool_lock);
+}