Message ID | 20140508225209.GA13610@lukather |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > The following changes since commit fd67f884782a281eb033e40b0f8eae623416035e: > > pinctrl: mvebu: new driver for Orion platforms (2014-04-24 15:09:35 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > https://github.com/mripard/linux.git tags/sunxi-pinctrl-for-3.16 Thanks a lot Maxime, pulled into the pinctrl devel branch for v3.16. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 08:48:15AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > The following changes since commit fd67f884782a281eb033e40b0f8eae623416035e: > > > > pinctrl: mvebu: new driver for Orion platforms (2014-04-24 15:09:35 +0200) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > https://github.com/mripard/linux.git tags/sunxi-pinctrl-for-3.16 > > Thanks a lot Maxime, pulled into the pinctrl devel branch for v3.16. Yeah, I don't know what happened for the first one. Sorry for that :S Only pinctrl/next is not going to be rebased, right? Thanks, Maxime
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Only pinctrl/next is not going to be rebased, right?
pinctrl/devel actually.
for-next is a mixdown branch that is rebased all the time
so don't use that.
But notify me first if you're going to be pulling in that branch!
(Handshake.)
Also: why do you need it? Just as a dependence to dts files
does *not* count as a reason to cross merge these trees,
as the device tree files are meant to even be moved out of
the kernel at some point... but you may have better reasons?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > Only pinctrl/next is not going to be rebased, right? > > pinctrl/devel actually. > > for-next is a mixdown branch that is rebased all the time > so don't use that. Ok. > But notify me first if you're going to be pulling in that branch! > (Handshake.) Yes, this is exactly what I'm doing :) > Also: why do you need it? Just as a dependence to dts files > does *not* count as a reason to cross merge these trees, > as the device tree files are meant to even be moved out of > the kernel at some point... but you may have better reasons? It's not about DT, it's about the patch to select the pinctrl drivers in the machine's Kconfig options. Thanks, Maxime
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Also: why do you need it? Just as a dependence to dts files >> does *not* count as a reason to cross merge these trees, >> as the device tree files are meant to even be moved out of >> the kernel at some point... but you may have better reasons? > > It's not about DT, it's about the patch to select the pinctrl drivers > in the machine's Kconfig options. But ... surely you can select a non-existant symbol and wait for it to appear during the merge window? Or is there some problem with this? Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:37:15AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > >> Also: why do you need it? Just as a dependence to dts files > >> does *not* count as a reason to cross merge these trees, > >> as the device tree files are meant to even be moved out of > >> the kernel at some point... but you may have better reasons? > > > > It's not about DT, it's about the patch to select the pinctrl drivers > > in the machine's Kconfig options. > > But ... surely you can select a non-existant symbol and wait > for it to appear during the merge window? > > Or is there some problem with this? Because it wouldn't be very easily bisectable. After discussing this a bit more with Arnd on IRC, I'll send you an additional patch for you to merge, that should solve the issue, without requiring any merge on my side. Thanks, Maxime