Message ID | 534F8750.70201@renesas.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Marek Vasut |
Headers | show |
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:48:32 AM, yasuhisa umano wrote: > This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. > The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition > of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > > Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> Is there any reason why those two patches were sent twice please ? They seem the same in both cases. Otherwise, I'm fine with those patches. Best regards, Marek Vasut
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:48:32 AM, yasuhisa umano wrote: > This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. > The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition > of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > > Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> > --- > drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c index dfe5423..c58d2a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int enable_controller(struct r8a66597 *r8a66597) > > r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, INTL, SOFCFG); > r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB0); > - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB1); > - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB2); > + for (port = 0; port < R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB; port++) > + r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, get_intenb_reg(port)); Hmm, looking at get_intenb_reg(), this is slightly dangerous, but I will trust you you know what you are doing . I am a bit worried someone might set R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB to value >2 and will wonder why doesn't it work. Anyway, I will apply this and if you feel my rant is valid, submit subsequent patch. Best regards, Marek Vasut
Hi Sorry. I failed to send patchs to ML by setting of MUA. Best regards, Yasuhisa (2014/04/17 19:47), Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:48:32 AM, yasuhisa umano wrote: >> This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. >> The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. >> This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition >> of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> > > Is there any reason why those two patches were sent twice please ? They seem the > same in both cases. > > Otherwise, I'm fine with those patches. > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut >
Hi, Thanks for your comment. (2014/04/17 23:07), Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:48:32 AM, yasuhisa umano wrote: >> This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. >> The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. >> This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition >> of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> >> --- >> drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c >> b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c index dfe5423..c58d2a9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c >> @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int enable_controller(struct r8a66597 *r8a66597) >> >> r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, INTL, SOFCFG); >> r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB0); >> - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB1); >> - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB2); >> + for (port = 0; port < R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB; port++) >> + r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, get_intenb_reg(port)); > > Hmm, looking at get_intenb_reg(), this is slightly dangerous, but I will trust > you you know what you are doing . I am a bit worried someone might set > R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB to value >2 and will wonder why doesn't it work. I understood your point. Certainly, current device drivers support only the initialization of 1 or 2 interrupt for hub. If this driver has a hub of more future, I will send the patch. > > Anyway, I will apply this and if you feel my rant is valid, submit subsequent > patch. Thank you. > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > Best regards, Yasuhisa
On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 04:25:41 AM, Yasuhisa Umano wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for your comment. > > (2014/04/17 23:07), Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 at 09:48:32 AM, yasuhisa umano wrote: > >> This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. > >> The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > >> This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition > >> of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > >> b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c index dfe5423..c58d2a9 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c > >> @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int enable_controller(struct r8a66597 > >> *r8a66597) > >> > >> r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, INTL, SOFCFG); > >> r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB0); > >> > >> - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB1); > >> - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB2); > >> + for (port = 0; port < R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB; port++) > >> + r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, get_intenb_reg(port)); > > > > Hmm, looking at get_intenb_reg(), this is slightly dangerous, but I will > > trust you you know what you are doing . I am a bit worried someone might > > set R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB to value >2 and will wonder why doesn't it > > work. > > I understood your point. > Certainly, current device drivers support only the initialization of 1 or 2 > interrupt for hub. > If this driver has a hub of more future, I will send the patch. Thanks Best regards, Marek Vasut
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c index dfe5423..c58d2a9 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int enable_controller(struct r8a66597 *r8a66597) r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, INTL, SOFCFG); r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB0); - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB1); - r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, INTENB2); + for (port = 0; port < R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB; port++) + r8a66597_write(r8a66597, 0, get_intenb_reg(port)); r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, CONFIG_R8A66597_ENDIAN & BIGEND, CFIFOSEL); r8a66597_bset(r8a66597, CONFIG_R8A66597_ENDIAN & BIGEND, D0FIFOSEL);
This driver is processed as two USB hub despite one. The number of root hub is defined in R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. This fixes that register is accessed by using the definition of R8A66597_MAX_ROOT_HUB. Signed-off-by: Yasuhisa Umano <yasuhisa.umano.zc@renesas.com> --- drivers/usb/host/r8a66597-hcd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)