diff mbox

[v2] net: cpsw: fix dual_emac VLAN issue

Message ID 1397048023-10522-1-git-send-email-yegorslists@googlemail.com
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Yegor Yefremov April 9, 2014, 12:53 p.m. UTC
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>

dual_emac mode was first introduced in TI's PSP kernel 3.2.
See repository git://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-am33x.git
commit 6afa003a0b06a0376c941436b38204ba2edc4a98.

Since commit d9ba8f9e6298af71ec1c1fd3d88c3ef68abd0ec3 dual_emac
feature was upstreamed, but with some changes compared to the original
source, that led to following behavior:

Some stations in LAN don't answer CPSW's ARP request. PSP kernel 3.2
could talk to all stations in the same LAN.

Use the same cpsw_ale_add_vlan procedure as in PSP kernel 3.2 to fix
this regression.

Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
CC: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
---
Changes:
	v2: make more detailed description

 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |    4 +++-
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Mugunthan V N April 9, 2014, 1:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:23 PM, yegorslists@googlemail.com wrote:
> From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
>
> dual_emac mode was first introduced in TI's PSP kernel 3.2.
> See repository git://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-am33x.git
> commit 6afa003a0b06a0376c941436b38204ba2edc4a98.
>
> Since commit d9ba8f9e6298af71ec1c1fd3d88c3ef68abd0ec3 dual_emac
> feature was upstreamed, but with some changes compared to the original
> source, that led to following behavior:
>
> Some stations in LAN don't answer CPSW's ARP request. PSP kernel 3.2
> could talk to all stations in the same LAN.
>
> Use the same cpsw_ale_add_vlan procedure as in PSP kernel 3.2 to fix
> this regression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
> CC: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changes:
> 	v2: make more detailed description
>
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 5d5fec6..aa06370 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -1040,11 +1040,13 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
>  	else
>  		slave_write(slave, slave->port_vlan, CPSW2_PORT_VLAN);
>  	cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, slave->port_vlan, port_mask,
> -			  port_mask, port_mask, 0);
> +			  0, port_mask, port_mask);

Dual EMAC VLAN must be untagged on egress and why you need unregistered
multicast packet to be passed to CPU?

>  	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>  			   port_mask, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
>  	cpsw_ale_add_ucast(priv->ale, priv->mac_addr,
>  		priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan);
> +	cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, 0, ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port,
> +		ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port, priv->host_port, 0);

Vlan ID 0 must not be used, cpsw default vlan id should be used,
currently 0 is used as default VLAN for internal packet switching, in
case some one using different default vlan id, then this fix will break.

I have fixed the issue already and submitted a patch.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/337769/

Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yegor Yefremov April 9, 2014, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 06:23 PM, yegorslists@googlemail.com wrote:
>> From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
>>
>> dual_emac mode was first introduced in TI's PSP kernel 3.2.
>> See repository git://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-am33x.git
>> commit 6afa003a0b06a0376c941436b38204ba2edc4a98.
>>
>> Since commit d9ba8f9e6298af71ec1c1fd3d88c3ef68abd0ec3 dual_emac
>> feature was upstreamed, but with some changes compared to the original
>> source, that led to following behavior:
>>
>> Some stations in LAN don't answer CPSW's ARP request. PSP kernel 3.2
>> could talk to all stations in the same LAN.
>>
>> Use the same cpsw_ale_add_vlan procedure as in PSP kernel 3.2 to fix
>> this regression.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
>> CC: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes:
>>       v2: make more detailed description
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |    4 +++-
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 5d5fec6..aa06370 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -1040,11 +1040,13 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
>>       else
>>               slave_write(slave, slave->port_vlan, CPSW2_PORT_VLAN);
>>       cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, slave->port_vlan, port_mask,
>> -                       port_mask, port_mask, 0);
>> +                       0, port_mask, port_mask);
>
> Dual EMAC VLAN must be untagged on egress and why you need unregistered
> multicast packet to be passed to CPU?
>
>>       cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
>>                          port_mask, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
>>       cpsw_ale_add_ucast(priv->ale, priv->mac_addr,
>>               priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan);
>> +     cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, 0, ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port,
>> +             ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port, priv->host_port, 0);
>
> Vlan ID 0 must not be used, cpsw default vlan id should be used,
> currently 0 is used as default VLAN for internal packet switching, in
> case some one using different default vlan id, then this fix will break.
>
> I have fixed the issue already and submitted a patch.
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/337769/

Good to know. I've tested it and I can talk to all stations now. Thanks.

I just compared both drivers (3.2 and upstream) and this was the first
routine, that caught my eye, after implementing it the way 3.2 did, I
got needed features running. But I wasn't sure, if my fix was correct,
that's why I asked for testing and commenting.

Yegor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 5d5fec6..aa06370 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -1040,11 +1040,13 @@  static inline void cpsw_add_dual_emac_def_ale_entries(
 	else
 		slave_write(slave, slave->port_vlan, CPSW2_PORT_VLAN);
 	cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, slave->port_vlan, port_mask,
-			  port_mask, port_mask, 0);
+			  0, port_mask, port_mask);
 	cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast,
 			   port_mask, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan, 0);
 	cpsw_ale_add_ucast(priv->ale, priv->mac_addr,
 		priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN, slave->port_vlan);
+	cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, 0, ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port,
+		ALE_ALL_PORTS << priv->host_port, priv->host_port, 0);
 }
 
 static void soft_reset_slave(struct cpsw_slave *slave)