===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "addc" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "adde" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "subfc" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "subfe" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "subf " } } */
+
+__int128
+add_128 (__int128 *ptr, __int128 val)
+{
+ return (*ptr + val);
+}
+
+__int128
+sub_128 (__int128 *ptr, __int128 val)
+{
+ return (*ptr - val);
+}
+
===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-inline" } */
+
+union U {
+ __int128 i128;
+ struct {
+ long l1;
+ long l2;
+ } s;
+};
+
+union U u1,u2;
+
+__int128
+create_128 (long most_sig, long least_sig)
+{
+ union U u;
+
+#if __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ u.s.l1 = least_sig;
+ u.s.l2 = most_sig;
+#else
+ u.s.l1 = most_sig;
+ u.s.l2 = least_sig;
+#endif
+ return u.i128;
+}
+
+long most_sig (union U * u)
+{
+#if __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ return (*u).s.l2;
+#else
+ return (*u).s.l1;
+#endif
+}
+
+long least_sig (union U * u)
+{
+#if __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+ return (*u).s.l1;
+#else
+ return (*u).s.l2;
+#endif
+}
+
+__int128
+add_128 (__int128 *ptr, __int128 val)
+{
+ return (*ptr + val);
+}
+
+__int128
+sub_128 (__int128 *ptr, __int128 val)
+{
+ return (*ptr - val);
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ /* Do a simple add/sub to make sure carry is happening between the dwords
+ and that dwords are in correct endian order. */
+ u1.i128 = create_128 (1, -1);
+ u2.i128 = add_128 (&u1.i128, 1);
+ if ((most_sig (&u2) != 2) || (least_sig (&u2) != 0))
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ u2.i128 = sub_128 (&u2.i128, 1);
+ if ((most_sig (&u2) != 1) || (least_sig (&u2) != -1))
+ __builtin_abort ();
+ return 0;
+}
+
===================================================================
@@ -6535,6 +6535,51 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*floatunsdisf2_m
[(set_attr "length" "8")
(set_attr "type" "fpload")])
+;; Define the TImode operations that can be done in a small number
+;; of instructions. The & constraints are to prevent the register
+;; allocator from allocating registers that overlap with the inputs
+;; (for example, having an input in 7,8 and an output in 6,7). We
+;; also allow for the output being the same as one of the inputs.
+
+(define_insn "addti3"
+ [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=&r,&r,r,r")
+ (plus:TI (match_operand:TI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "%r,r,0,0")
+ (match_operand:TI 2 "reg_or_short_operand" "r,I,r,I")))]
+ "TARGET_POWERPC64"
+ "*
+{
+ if (WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN)
+ return (GET_CODE (operands[2])) != CONST_INT
+ ? \"addc %L0,%L1,%L2\;adde %0,%1,%2\"
+ : \"addic %L0,%L1,%2\;add%G2e %0,%1\";
+ else
+ return (GET_CODE (operands[2])) != CONST_INT
+ ? \"addc %0,%1,%2\;adde %L0,%L1,%L2\"
+ : \"addic %0,%1,%2\;add%G2e %L0,%L1\";
+}"
+ [(set_attr "type" "two")
+ (set_attr "length" "8")])
+
+(define_insn "subti3"
+ [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=&r,&r,r,r,r")
+ (minus:TI (match_operand:TI 1 "reg_or_short_operand" "r,I,0,r,I")
+ (match_operand:TI 2 "gpc_reg_operand" "r,r,r,0,0")))]
+ "TARGET_POWERPC64"
+ "*
+{
+ if (WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN)
+ return (GET_CODE (operands[1]) != CONST_INT)
+ ? \"subfc %L0,%L2,%L1\;subfe %0,%2,%1\"
+ : \"subfic %L0,%L2,%1\;subf%G1e %0,%2\";
+ else
+ return (GET_CODE (operands[1]) != CONST_INT)
+ ? \"subfc %0,%2,%1\;subfe %L0,%L2,%L1\"
+ : \"subfic %0,%2,%1\;subf%G1e %L0,%L2\";
+}"
+ [(set_attr "type" "two")
+ (set_attr "length" "8")])
+
+
;; Define the DImode operations that can be done in a small number
;; of instructions. The & constraints are to prevent the register
;; allocator from allocating registers that overlap with the inputs
The following patch improves the code generated for TImode add/sub so that we now generate a 2 insn sequence which makes use of the carry bit. Bootstrap/regtest (on both BE/LE) with no new failures. Ok for trunk and 4.8? -Pat 2014-04-08 Pat Haugen <pthaugen@us.ibm.com> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (addti3, subti3): New. gcc/testsuite: * gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math1.c: New. * gcc.target/powerpc/ti_math2.c: New.