| Message ID | 007a01cf4d6d$25dc6ad0$71954070$@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, bin.cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > Patch for PR60363 is sent at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00857.html , but it needs to > wait for stage 1. In the meanwhile this patch is to xfail the case for > logical_op_short_circuit targets. Is it ok? Ok if you verified that this syntax works. Thanks, Richard. > Thanks, > bin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > 2014-04-01 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> > > PR target/60363 > * gcc.target/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c: Xfail for > logical_op_short_circuit targets.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guenther@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:14 PM > To: Bin Cheng > Cc: GCC Patches > Subject: Re: [PATCH PR60363]XFAIL case ssa-dom-thread-4.c for > logical_op_short_circuit targets > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:42 AM, bin.cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Patch for PR60363 is sent at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00857.html , but it needs > > to wait for stage 1. In the meanwhile this patch is to xfail the case > > for logical_op_short_circuit targets. Is it ok? > > Ok if you verified that this syntax works. I ran the case on both logical_op_short_circuit and non-logical_op_short_circuit targets. The case is skipped on non-logical_op_short_circuit target and expected failed on logical_op_short_circuit target, so I think it works. Thanks, bin > > Thanks, > Richard. > > > Thanks, > > bin > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > 2014-04-01 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> > > > > PR target/60363 > > * gcc.target/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c: Xfail for > > logical_op_short_circuit targets.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c (revision 208802) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c (working copy) @@ -76,6 +76,6 @@ bitmap_ior_and_compl (bitmap dst, const_bitmap a, -> "kill_elt->indx == b_elt->indx" in the second condition, skipping the known-true "b_elt && kill_elt" in the second condition. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Threaded" 4 "dom1" { target logical_op_short_circuit } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Threaded" 4 "dom1" { target logical_op_short_circuit xfail logical_op_short_circuit } } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "dom1" } } */