Patchwork [GIT,PULL] Samsung clock changes for v3.15

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Tomasz Figa
Date March 17, 2014, 5:59 p.m.
Message ID <1395079197-13598-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/331095/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk

Comments

Tomasz Figa - March 17, 2014, 5:59 p.m.
The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:

  Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk

for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:

  Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------

Samsung clock patches for v3.15.

Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
tree, so this pull request is rather small. It contains various patches
collected since the last merge window:

1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):

220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]

2) clock driver extensions:

db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx

The patches are based on clk-s3c24xx branch of linux-samsung tree, due to
dependencies of further patches on S3C24xx clock driver and clock PM
refactor.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Heiko Stuebner (12):
      clk: samsung: add pll_6552 variant for s3c2416
      clk: samsung: add plls used by the s3c2443
      dt-bindings: add binding for clock-controller of s3c2443 and following
      clk: samsung: add clock-driver for s3c2416, s3c2443 and s3c2450
      ARM: S3C24XX: prevent conflicts between ccf and non-ccf s3c24xx-socs
      ARM: dts: add clock data for s3c2416
      ARM: S3C24XX: Convert s3c2416 and s3c2443 to common clock framework
      ARM: S3C24XX: only store clock registers when old clock code is active
      clk: samsung: add plls used by the early s3c24xx cpus
      dt-bindings: add documentation for s3c2412 clock controller
      clk: samsung: add clock controller driver for s3c2412
      ARM: S3C24XX: convert s3c2412 to common clock framework

Naveen Krishna Chatradhi (1):
      clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module

Pankaj Dubey (2):
      clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
      clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]

Rahul Sharma (2):
      clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
      clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx

Sachin Kamat (1):
      clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset

Tomasz Figa (14):
      clk: exynos4: Remove remnants of non-DT support
      clk: samsung: Provide common helpers for register save/restore
      clk: samsung: exynos4: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: exynos5250: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: exynos5420: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: s3c64xx: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: Drop old suspend/resume code
      clk: samsung: exynos4: Add remaining suspend/resume handling
      ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code
      clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
      Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-clk-next
      Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next
      Merge branch 'for_3.15/exynos5260' into samsung-next
      Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next

 .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5250-clock.txt |   1 +
 .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2412-clock.txt       |  50 ++
 .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2443-clock.txt       |  56 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416-smdk2416.dts             |  13 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416.dtsi                     |  42 ++
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c                          | 148 +---
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig                      |  24 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile                     |   7 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2412.c              | 761 ---------------------
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2416.c              | 171 -----
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2443.c              | 212 ------
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common-s3c2443.c             | 675 ------------------
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.c                     |  27 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.h                     |  10 +
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-jive.c                  |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-s3c2416-dt.c            |  39 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2413.c              |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c              |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2443.c              |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-vstms.c                 |   9 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm.c                         |  13 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/s3c2412.c                    |  43 --
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |   2 +
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c                  | 213 ++++--
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c               |  71 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c               |  75 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c               |  18 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c                      | 489 ++++++++++++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h                      |   8 +
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c                  | 274 ++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c                  | 466 +++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c                  | 121 +++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c                          | 190 +++--
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h                          |  72 +-
 include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h             |   1 +
 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2412.h                |  73 ++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2443.h                |  92 +++
 37 files changed, 2202 insertions(+), 2300 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2412-clock.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2443-clock.txt
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2412.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2416.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2443.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common-s3c2443.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2412.h
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2443.h
Mike Turquette - March 19, 2014, 1:06 a.m.
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57)
> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
> 
>   Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:
> 
>   Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Samsung clock patches for v3.15.
> 
> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
> tree, so this pull request is rather small.

I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it
covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take.

> It contains various patches
> collected since the last merge window:
> 
> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):
> 
> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> 
> 2) clock driver extensions:
> 
> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx

Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake
when generating this pull request?

Thanks,
Mike

> 
> The patches are based on clk-s3c24xx branch of linux-samsung tree, due to
> dependencies of further patches on S3C24xx clock driver and clock PM
> refactor.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Heiko Stuebner (12):
>       clk: samsung: add pll_6552 variant for s3c2416
>       clk: samsung: add plls used by the s3c2443
>       dt-bindings: add binding for clock-controller of s3c2443 and following
>       clk: samsung: add clock-driver for s3c2416, s3c2443 and s3c2450
>       ARM: S3C24XX: prevent conflicts between ccf and non-ccf s3c24xx-socs
>       ARM: dts: add clock data for s3c2416
>       ARM: S3C24XX: Convert s3c2416 and s3c2443 to common clock framework
>       ARM: S3C24XX: only store clock registers when old clock code is active
>       clk: samsung: add plls used by the early s3c24xx cpus
>       dt-bindings: add documentation for s3c2412 clock controller
>       clk: samsung: add clock controller driver for s3c2412
>       ARM: S3C24XX: convert s3c2412 to common clock framework
> 
> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi (1):
>       clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
> 
> Pankaj Dubey (2):
>       clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
>       clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> 
> Rahul Sharma (2):
>       clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
>       clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
> 
> Sachin Kamat (1):
>       clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
> 
> Tomasz Figa (14):
>       clk: exynos4: Remove remnants of non-DT support
>       clk: samsung: Provide common helpers for register save/restore
>       clk: samsung: exynos4: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
>       clk: samsung: exynos5250: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
>       clk: samsung: exynos5420: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
>       clk: samsung: s3c64xx: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
>       clk: samsung: Drop old suspend/resume code
>       clk: samsung: exynos4: Add remaining suspend/resume handling
>       ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code
>       clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
>       Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-clk-next
>       Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next
>       Merge branch 'for_3.15/exynos5260' into samsung-next
>       Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos5250-clock.txt |   1 +
>  .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2412-clock.txt       |  50 ++
>  .../bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2443-clock.txt       |  56 ++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416-smdk2416.dts             |  13 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416.dtsi                     |  42 ++
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c                          | 148 +---
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig                      |  24 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Makefile                     |   7 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2412.c              | 761 ---------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2416.c              | 171 -----
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2443.c              | 212 ------
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common-s3c2443.c             | 675 ------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.c                     |  27 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common.h                     |  10 +
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-jive.c                  |   9 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-s3c2416-dt.c            |  39 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2413.c              |   9 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c              |   9 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2443.c              |   9 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-vstms.c                 |   9 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/pm.c                         |  13 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/s3c2412.c                    |  43 --
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile                       |   2 +
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c                  | 213 ++++--
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c               |  71 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c               |  75 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c               |  18 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c                      | 489 ++++++++++++-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h                      |   8 +
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c                  | 274 ++++++++
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c                  | 466 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c                  | 121 +++-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c                          | 190 +++--
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h                          |  72 +-
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h             |   1 +
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2412.h                |  73 ++
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2443.h                |  92 +++
>  37 files changed, 2202 insertions(+), 2300 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2412-clock.txt
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s3c2443-clock.txt
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2412.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2416.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/clock-s3c2443.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/common-s3c2443.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2412.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2443.c
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2412.h
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/s3c2443.h
Tomasz Figa - March 19, 2014, 1:19 a.m.
Hi Mike,

On 19.03.2014 02:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57)
>> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
>>
>>    Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:
>>
>>    Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Samsung clock patches for v3.15.
>>
>> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
>> tree, so this pull request is rather small.
>
> I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it
> covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take.
>
>> It contains various patches
>> collected since the last merge window:
>>
>> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):
>>
>> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
>> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
>> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
>>
>> 2) clock driver extensions:
>>
>> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
>> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
>> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
>> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
>
> Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake
> when generating this pull request?

The problem with this pull request is that it contains patches that 
require quite a lot of dependencies that have been already applied into 
Samsung SoC tree. I'm not sure how else such situation could be handled, 
other than pulling respective commits into my tree as well.

I don't think this would make any problem when merging into Linus' tree, 
as these are exactly the same commits that will go through ARM SoC, so 
git should merge them just fine. Still, if you have a better idea what 
to do now, I will do so.

Best regards,
Tomasz
Mike Turquette - March 19, 2014, 4:07 a.m.
Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-18 18:19:25)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 19.03.2014 02:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57)
> >> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
> >>
> >>    Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:
> >>
> >>    Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Samsung clock patches for v3.15.
> >>
> >> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
> >> tree, so this pull request is rather small.
> >
> > I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it
> > covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take.
> >
> >> It contains various patches
> >> collected since the last merge window:
> >>
> >> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):
> >>
> >> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
> >> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
> >> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> >>
> >> 2) clock driver extensions:
> >>
> >> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
> >> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
> >> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
> >> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
> >
> > Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake
> > when generating this pull request?
> 
> The problem with this pull request is that it contains patches that 
> require quite a lot of dependencies that have been already applied into 
> Samsung SoC tree. I'm not sure how else such situation could be handled, 
> other than pulling respective commits into my tree as well.

There are already a fair number of clk patches going through the samsung
tree. So in the name of consistency for this upcoming merge window it
might be best to take these patches through there as well. Let me know
if that creates any undo burden on you. Otherwise please add:

Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>

Regards,
Mike

> 
> I don't think this would make any problem when merging into Linus' tree, 
> as these are exactly the same commits that will go through ARM SoC, so 
> git should merge them just fine. Still, if you have a better idea what 
> to do now, I will do so.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
Tomasz Figa - March 19, 2014, 12:12 p.m.
On 19.03.2014 05:07, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-18 18:19:25)
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 19.03.2014 02:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57)
>>>> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
>>>>
>>>>     Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:
>>>>
>>>>     Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Samsung clock patches for v3.15.
>>>>
>>>> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
>>>> tree, so this pull request is rather small.
>>>
>>> I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it
>>> covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take.
>>>
>>>> It contains various patches
>>>> collected since the last merge window:
>>>>
>>>> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):
>>>>
>>>> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
>>>> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
>>>> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
>>>>
>>>> 2) clock driver extensions:
>>>>
>>>> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
>>>> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
>>>> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
>>>> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
>>>
>>> Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake
>>> when generating this pull request?
>>
>> The problem with this pull request is that it contains patches that
>> require quite a lot of dependencies that have been already applied into
>> Samsung SoC tree. I'm not sure how else such situation could be handled,
>> other than pulling respective commits into my tree as well.
>
> There are already a fair number of clk patches going through the samsung
> tree. So in the name of consistency for this upcoming merge window it
> might be best to take these patches through there as well. Let me know
> if that creates any undo burden on you. Otherwise please add:
>
> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>

 From my perspective, as long as the patches flow upstream, it's one and 
the same. I wonder whether ARM SoC tree is still open for merges, 
though. Arnd, Olof?

Best regards,
Tomasz
Arnd Bergmann - March 19, 2014, 12:41 p.m.
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 13:12:43 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 19.03.2014 05:07, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-18 18:19:25)
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> On 19.03.2014 02:06, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>> Quoting Tomasz Figa (2014-03-17 10:59:57)
> >>>> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git tags/for_3.15/samsung-clk
> >>>>
> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 70d1cf1c85486753fec0c60a9a093bdfe42b89b4:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Merge branch 'for_3.15/misc' into samsung-next (2014-03-17 13:00:01 +0100)
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Samsung clock patches for v3.15.
> >>>>
> >>>> Due to dependencies, most of the patches already went through linux-samsung
> >>>> tree, so this pull request is rather small.
> >>>
> >>> I'm a bit confused. This PR is not really small (32 patches) and it
> >>> covers more stuff from arch/arm that I usually take.
> >>>
> >>>> It contains various patches
> >>>> collected since the last merge window:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) non-critical fixes (without need to push to stable):
> >>>>
> >>>> 220b0cc clk: samsung: Initialize clock table with error pointers
> >>>> 58d83cb clk: exynos-5420: Fix VPLL lock offset
> >>>> 3299bc3 clk: samsung: fixed compiler warning [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) clock driver extensions:
> >>>>
> >>>> db40d0c clk: samsung exynos5250/5420: Add gate clock for SSS module
> >>>> d8b9731 clk/samsung: add support for multiple clock providers
> >>>> 45af130 clk/samsung: add support for pll2550xx
> >>>> adec437 clk/samsung: add support for pll2650xx
> >>>
> >>> Right, these 7 patches would constitute a small PR. Was there a mistake
> >>> when generating this pull request?
> >>
> >> The problem with this pull request is that it contains patches that
> >> require quite a lot of dependencies that have been already applied into
> >> Samsung SoC tree. I'm not sure how else such situation could be handled,
> >> other than pulling respective commits into my tree as well.
> >
> > There are already a fair number of clk patches going through the samsung
> > tree. So in the name of consistency for this upcoming merge window it
> > might be best to take these patches through there as well. Let me know
> > if that creates any undo burden on you. Otherwise please add:
> >
> > Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> 
>  From my perspective, as long as the patches flow upstream, it's one and 
> the same. I wonder whether ARM SoC tree is still open for merges, 
> though. Arnd, Olof?
> 

We can probably still take the bug fixes, but I'd have to take a closer
look at other ones. Probably one of us would say no to those.

	Arnd