From patchwork Sat Mar 8 20:42:53 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tobias Burnus X-Patchwork-Id: 328246 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B262E2C009E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 07:43:10 +1100 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=seyxvMkKCano4wpRr 2RMOgWPFq7APEzmcLHVxrtcUW6cCMPchCb2OKAEXF8H7B36vLScIZplIg/sNP2lb 8KztmZQLkvHj+mYDDd80fgSKfbOOXeXA9sOE3cmAiK6juhMUYgz52isIPzOnnfWa 8FjBAIDGj+36e9KWaKiX9yRQ10= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=e49qo6UX4pJmGVuCoOvOJGj X09c=; b=WjtFm2Z1P+S+gQBV+HJPE42VmVPhC51EaShYMkOCd/0Q3IMwVujwnQ5 pOWCFlHYBbSjBFgJnOyvCseVl8mIGInD+SjEO0RGm+wsj8HLs6EeJeoaAT/CT7GC JR44/szjJCM0JbZ6y7lCJKoYNwC2QkxDXMq4ExOyPUH52r+r9Yoo= Received: (qmail 18088 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2014 20:43:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18070 invoked by uid 89); 8 Mar 2014 20:43:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx02.qsc.de Received: from mx02.qsc.de (HELO mx02.qsc.de) (213.148.130.14) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:42:58 +0000 Received: from tux.net-b.de (port-92-194-14-144.dynamic.qsc.de [92.194.14.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D09FC276CB; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:42:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <531B80CD.3060006@net-b.de> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2014 21:42:53 +0100 From: Tobias Burnus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Iyer, Balaji V" , Gerald Pfeifer CC: gcc-patches , Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes References: <531B60A4.7050209@net-b.de> <531B6E35.3050803@net-b.de> <531B759C.80602@net-b.de> <531B7825.8030302@net-b.de> In-Reply-To: Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > 1.2 is 1.1 ABI with the language spec reformatted. No new features has > been added in between 1.1 and 1.2. So, you can say either one. >> Or should we simply remove the ABI version completely? I have attached >> such a patch > I would put the ABI version, since the Cilk users will ask for it. Fine with me - but then it makes sense to put the latest version (ABI 1.2): Users not knowing Cilk well, then see that the latest is supported while knowledge users know that 1.2 is just a cleanup. I have now committed the attached patches. Tobias 2014-03-08 Tobias Burnus * doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkplus): Update implementation status. Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi =================================================================== --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (Revision 208431) +++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (Arbeitskopie) @@ -1889,12 +1889,11 @@ are ignored. Enable the usage of Cilk Plus language extension features for C/C++. When the option @option{-fcilkplus} is specified, enable the usage of the Cilk Plus Language extension features for C/C++. The present -implementation follows ABI version 0.9. This is an experimental +implementation follows ABI version 1.2. This is an experimental feature that is only partially complete, and whose interface may change in future versions of GCC as the official specification -changes. Currently only the array notation feature of the language -specification has been implemented. More features will be implemented -in subsequent release cycles. +changes. Currently, all features but @code{_Cilk_for} have been +implemented. @item -fgnu-tm @opindex fgnu-tm