Patchwork [GIT,PULL,5/6] Samsung PM updates for v3.15

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Kukjin Kim
Date March 3, 2014, 9:56 a.m.
Message ID <8259832.260591393840570438.JavaMail.weblogic@epml16>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/325750/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1

Comments

Kukjin Kim - March 3, 2014, 9:56 a.m.
The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:

  Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1

for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61:

  ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung S2R PM updates for v3.15

>From Tomasz Figa:
This series reworks suspend/resume handling of Samsung clock drivers
to cover more SoC specific aspects that are beyond simple register
save and restore. The goal is to have all the suspend/resume code
that touches the clock controller in single place, which is the clock
driver.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Figa (9):
      clk: exynos4: Remove remnants of non-DT support
      clk: samsung: Provide common helpers for register save/restore
      clk: samsung: exynos4: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: exynos5250: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: exynos5420: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: s3c64xx: Move suspend/resume handling to SoC driver
      clk: samsung: Drop old suspend/resume code
      clk: samsung: exynos4: Add remaining suspend/resume handling
      ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c            |  148 +----------------------------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |  172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   49 +++++++++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   49 +++++++++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5440.c |    2 +-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c64xx.c    |   79 +++++++++++++---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c            |   71 +++++---------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   14 ++-
 8 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 236 deletions(-)
Olof Johansson - March 9, 2014, 6:35 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
> 
>   Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61:
> 
>   ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900)

Hi,

I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll hold
off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect they'll be
fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.


-Olof
Tomasz Figa - March 9, 2014, 11:32 p.m.
On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> The following changes since commit 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
>>
>>    Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>    http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git tags/samsung-pm-1
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61:
>>
>>    ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14 08:16:01 +0900)
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll hold
> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect they'll be
> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.

I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK 
my own patches. ;)

Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz
Olof Johansson - March 10, 2014, 12:08 a.m.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
>>>
>>>    Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>    http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>> tags/samsung-pm-1
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61:
>>>
>>>    ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14
>>> 08:16:01 +0900)
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
>> hold
>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
>> they'll be
>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
>
>
> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my
> own patches. ;)
>
> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
>
> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)

I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.


-Olof
Kukjin Kim - March 11, 2014, 1:50 a.m.
Olof Johansson wrote:
> 
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
> >> hold
> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
> >> they'll be
> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
> >
> >
> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK
> my
> > own patches. ;)
> >
> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
> >
> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> 
> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
> 
> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.
> 
OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's
response.

BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that?

- Kukjin
Olof Johansson - March 11, 2014, 2:52 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
>> >> hold
>> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
>> >> they'll be
>> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
>> >
>> >
>> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK
>> my
>> > own patches. ;)
>> >
>> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>>
>> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
>>
>> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
>> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
>> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.
>>
> OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's
> response.
>
> BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that?

If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase.


-Olof
Tomasz Figa - March 17, 2014, 6:09 p.m.
Hi Mike,

On 10.03.2014 01:08, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 09.03.2014 19:35, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:56:11AM +0000, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> 38dbfb59d1175ef458d006556061adeaa8751b72:
>>>>
>>>>     Linus 3.14-rc1 (2014-02-02 16:42:13 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>     http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>>> tags/samsung-pm-1
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to e11d919e4aa2009077e3e4f829ff991d37adca61:
>>>>
>>>>     ARM: EXYNOS: Drop legacy Exynos4 clock suspend/resume code (2014-02-14
>>>> 08:16:01 +0900)
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
>>> hold
>>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
>>> they'll be
>>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
>>
>>
>> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK my
>> own patches. ;)
>>
>> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
>>
>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>
> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
>
> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.

May we get your ACK for this? I hope it's not too late already to have 
them merged for 3.15.

Best regards,
Tomasz
Mike Turquette - March 19, 2014, 4:01 a.m.
Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01)
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
> >> >> hold
> >> >> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
> >> >> they'll be
> >> >> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK
> >> my
> >> > own patches. ;)
> >> >
> >> > Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
> >>
> >> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
> >> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
> >> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.
> >>
> > OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's
> > response.
> >
> > BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that?
> 
> If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase.

Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>

> 
> 
> -Olof
Kukjin Kim - March 20, 2014, 7:39 p.m.
On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01)
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>  wrote:
>>> Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here. I'll
>>>>>> hold
>>>>>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
>>>>>> they'll be
>>>>>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to ACK
>>>> my
>>>>> own patches. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without the
>>>> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I said,
>>>> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.
>>>>
>>> OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's
>>> response.
>>>
>>> BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that?
>>
>> If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need to rebase.
>
Thanks :-)

> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>
It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung 
clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".

Thanks,
Kukjin
Kukjin Kim - March 28, 2014, 8:52 a.m.
Kukjin Kim wrote:
> 
> On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Olof Johansson (2014-03-10 19:52:01)
> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't see a single cc or acked-by line from Mike Turquette here.
> I'll
> >>>>>> hold
> >>>>>> off until he's had a chance to take a look at these ones; I suspect
> >>>>>> they'll be
> >>>>>> fine since it's mostly code refactoring though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I guess I should have ACKed them too, but it felt kind of strange to
> ACK
> >>>> my
> >>>>> own patches. ;)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyway, for all samsung-clk patches:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@samsung.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, self-acking doesn't make much sense. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm mostly worried about patches touching other subsystems without
> the
> >>>> other maintainer being aware of it or having reviewed them. As I
said,
> >>>> these mostly look like refactorings but it's still good habit.
> >>>>
> >>> OK, agreed, I think Mike knew about that though. Let's wait for Mike's
> >>> response.
> >>>
> >>> BTW, should I sort out the branch again if Mike gives ack on that?
> >>
> >> If I hear from Mike that he's OK with it then I can merge it, no need
> to rebase.
> >
> Thanks :-)
> 
> > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> >
> It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> 
Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,

Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?

- Kukjin
Arnd Bergmann - March 29, 2014, 1:47 a.m.
On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > 
> > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >
> > Thanks :-)
> > 
> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > >
> > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > 
> Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> 
> Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> 

Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
next/drivers now.

	Arnd
Heiko Stübner - March 29, 2014, 12:10 p.m.
Hi Arnd,

Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > 
> > > Thanks :-)
> > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > 
> > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > 
> > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > 
> > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> 
> Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> next/drivers now.

maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung clk-
s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the week? :-)


Thanks
Heiko
Kukjin Kim - April 2, 2014, 4:25 a.m.
Heiko Stübner wrote:
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks :-)
> > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > >
> > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > >
> > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > >
> > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> > next/drivers now.
> 
> maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> clk-
> s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the
> week? :-)
> 
Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed...

Arnd, Olof and Mike,

Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when dependency
with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, I'm
not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time...

- Kukjin
Mike Turquette - April 3, 2014, 7:19 a.m.
Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45)
> Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > > >
> > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> > > next/drivers now.
> > 
> > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > clk-
> > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the
> > week? :-)
> > 
> Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed...
> 
> Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> 
> Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when dependency
> with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window, I'm
> not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time...

Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for
3.15 though.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> - Kukjin
>
Kukjin Kim - April 3, 2014, 9:24 a.m.
Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45)
> > Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Arnd,
> > >
> > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> > > > next/drivers now.
> > >
> > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6]
> Samsung
> > > clk-
> > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the
> > > week? :-)
> > >
> > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed...
> >
> > Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> >
> > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when
> dependency
> > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window,
> I'm
> > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time...
> 
> Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for
> 3.15 though.
> 
Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-)

BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I should queue it for v3.16?...

- Kukjin
Heiko Stübner - April 3, 2014, 9:58 a.m.
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, 18:24:25 schrieb Kukjin Kim:
> Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45)
> > 
> > > Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > Hi Arnd,
> > > > 
> > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks :-)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6] Samsung
> > > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> > > > > next/drivers now.
> > > > 
> > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6]
> > 
> > Samsung
> > 
> > > > clk-
> > > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the
> > > > week? :-)
> > > 
> > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed...
> > > 
> > > Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > 
> > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when
> > 
> > dependency
> > 
> > > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge window,
> > 
> > I'm
> > 
> > > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time...
> > 
> > Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for
> > 3.15 though.
> 
> Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-)
> 
> BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I
> should queue it for v3.16?...

I guess this would be the best option. I should also be able to finish the 
s3c2410/2440/2442 conversion until then, which needs a bit more work.


Heiko
Kukjin Kim - April 3, 2014, 10:03 a.m.
Heiko Stübner wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2014, 18:24:25 schrieb Kukjin Kim:
> > Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2014-04-01 21:25:45)
> > >
> > > > Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > > Hi Arnd,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Samstag, 29. März 2014, 02:47:33 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > > > > > On Friday 28 March 2014, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 03/19/14 13:01, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's time. Please pull this [5/6] and "[GIT PULL 6/6]
> Samsung
> > > > > > > > clk-s3c24xx updates for v3.15".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still I cannot see this in arm-soc. Any problems?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry, I didn't have this one on my radar any more, merged into
> > > > > > next/drivers now.
> > > > >
> > > > > maybe you could also take a look at the depending "[GIT PULL 6/6]
> > >
> > > Samsung
> > >
> > > > > clk-
> > > > > s3c24xx updates for v3.15" we walked about at the beginning of the
> > > > > week? :-)
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, so I've informed that [5/6] and [6/6] is needed...
> > > >
> > > > Arnd, Olof and Mike,
> > > >
> > > > Probably you guys missed "[6/6] Samsung clk-s3c24xx updates" when
> > >
> > > dependency
> > >
> > > > with [5/6] has been cleared but since it's already 3.15 merge
window,
> > >
> > > I'm
> > >
> > > > not sure it can be sent to Linus in this time...
> > >
> > > Both PRs were Acked by me, so no problems from my end. Pretty late for
> > > 3.15 though.
> >
> > Yeah, I know. I mean 'Arnd, Olof and Kevin' ;-)
> >
> > BTW, hmm...I know, it's too late for v3.15...so...unfortunately maybe I
> > should queue it for v3.16?...
> 
> I guess this would be the best option. I should also be able to finish the
> s3c2410/2440/2442 conversion until then, which needs a bit more work.
> 
Hi Heiko,

OK, I will rebase the branch once 3.15-rc1 is ready for 3.16. Thanks and
Sorry ;-)

- Kukjin