Message ID | 1390580324-1924-2-git-send-email-petar.jovanovic@rt-rk.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Am 24.01.2014 17:18, schrieb Petar Jovanovic: > From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com> > > Add mips32r5-generic among CPU definitions for MIPS. > Define ISA_MIPS32R3 and ISA_MIPS32R5. > > Signed-off-by: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com> > --- > target-mips/mips-defs.h | 8 ++++++++ > target-mips/translate_init.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target-mips/mips-defs.h b/target-mips/mips-defs.h > index bf094a3..9dfa516 100644 > --- a/target-mips/mips-defs.h > +++ b/target-mips/mips-defs.h > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ > #define ISA_MIPS32R2 0x00000040 > #define ISA_MIPS64 0x00000080 > #define ISA_MIPS64R2 0x00000100 > +#define ISA_MIPS32R3 0x00000200 > +#define ISA_MIPS32R5 0x00000400 > > /* MIPS ASEs. */ > #define ASE_MIPS16 0x00001000 > @@ -64,6 +66,12 @@ > #define CPU_MIPS32R2 (CPU_MIPS32 | ISA_MIPS32R2) > #define CPU_MIPS64R2 (CPU_MIPS64 | CPU_MIPS32R2 | ISA_MIPS64R2) > > +/* MIPS Technologies "Release 3" */ > +#define CPU_MIPS32R3 (CPU_MIPS32R2 | ISA_MIPS32R3) > + > +/* MIPS Technologies "Release 5" */ > +#define CPU_MIPS32R5 (CPU_MIPS32R3 | ISA_MIPS32R5) > + > /* Strictly follow the architecture standard: > - Disallow "special" instruction handling for PMON/SPIM. > Note that we still maintain Count/Compare to match the host clock. */ > diff --git a/target-mips/translate_init.c b/target-mips/translate_init.c > index c45b1b2..d74a0af 100644 > --- a/target-mips/translate_init.c > +++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c > @@ -333,6 +333,31 @@ static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = > .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R2 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, > .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, > }, > + { > + /* A generic CPU providing MIPS32 Release 5 features. > + FIXME: Eventually this should be replaced by a real CPU model. */ That is not really possible. QEMU needs to keep command line backwards compatibility, so if you add a generic model now, we will need to live with the generic model for a long time. What's the difficulty with taking "a real CPU model"? Is there no silicon yet or just a code name rather than a marketing name? Otherwise the patch looks okay. Regards, Andreas P.S. If you want to ping a patch series, please ping the cover letter. Sorry it's been taking so long, I'll provide my promised comments on the KVM series right now... > + .name = "mips32r5-generic", > + .CP0_PRid = 0x00019700, > + .CP0_Config0 = MIPS_CONFIG0 | (0x1 << CP0C0_AR) | > + (MMU_TYPE_R4000 << CP0C0_MT), > + .CP0_Config1 = MIPS_CONFIG1 | (1 << CP0C1_FP) | (15 << CP0C1_MMU) | > + (0 << CP0C1_IS) | (3 << CP0C1_IL) | (1 << CP0C1_IA) | > + (0 << CP0C1_DS) | (3 << CP0C1_DL) | (1 << CP0C1_DA) | > + (1 << CP0C1_CA), > + .CP0_Config2 = MIPS_CONFIG2, > + .CP0_Config3 = MIPS_CONFIG3, > + .CP0_LLAddr_rw_bitmask = 0, > + .CP0_LLAddr_shift = 4, > + .SYNCI_Step = 32, > + .CCRes = 2, > + .CP0_Status_rw_bitmask = 0x3778FF1F, > + .CP1_fcr0 = (1 << FCR0_F64) | (1 << FCR0_L) | (1 << FCR0_W) | > + (1 << FCR0_D) | (1 << FCR0_S) | (0x93 << FCR0_PRID), > + .SEGBITS = 32, > + .PABITS = 32, > + .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R5 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, > + .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, > + }, > #if defined(TARGET_MIPS64) > { > .name = "R4000", >
> with the generic model for a long time. What's the difficulty with > taking "a real CPU model"? Is there no silicon yet No silicon available yet. Regards, Petar
On 10 February 2014 13:51, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > Am 24.01.2014 17:18, schrieb Petar Jovanovic: >> From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com> >> --- a/target-mips/translate_init.c >> +++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c >> @@ -333,6 +333,31 @@ static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = >> .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R2 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, >> .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, >> }, >> + { >> + /* A generic CPU providing MIPS32 Release 5 features. >> + FIXME: Eventually this should be replaced by a real CPU model. */ > > That is not really possible. QEMU needs to keep command line backwards > compatibility, so if you add a generic model now, we will need to live > with the generic model for a long time. What's the difficulty with > taking "a real CPU model"? Is there no silicon yet or just a code name > rather than a marketing name? Good point, though I notice we have two MIPS CPUs already with this same 'FIXME' comment about being generic. thanks -- PMM
On 10 February 2014 15:42, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 February 2014 13:51, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >> Am 24.01.2014 17:18, schrieb Petar Jovanovic: >>> From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com> >>> --- a/target-mips/translate_init.c >>> +++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c >>> @@ -333,6 +333,31 @@ static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = >>> .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R2 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, >>> .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, >>> }, >>> + { >>> + /* A generic CPU providing MIPS32 Release 5 features. >>> + FIXME: Eventually this should be replaced by a real CPU model. */ >> >> That is not really possible. QEMU needs to keep command line backwards >> compatibility, so if you add a generic model now, we will need to live >> with the generic model for a long time. What's the difficulty with >> taking "a real CPU model"? Is there no silicon yet or just a code name >> rather than a marketing name? > > Good point, though I notice we have two MIPS CPUs already > with this same 'FIXME' comment about being generic. So before I apply the pull request with this patch, does anybody want to actually object to adding another 'generic' MIPS CPU to the two we have already? It seems reasonable enough to me. thanks -- PMM
Am 13.02.2014 15:51, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 10 February 2014 15:42, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 10 February 2014 13:51, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >>> Am 24.01.2014 17:18, schrieb Petar Jovanovic: >>>> From: Petar Jovanovic <petar.jovanovic@imgtec.com> >>>> --- a/target-mips/translate_init.c >>>> +++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c >>>> @@ -333,6 +333,31 @@ static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = >>>> .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R2 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, >>>> .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, >>>> }, >>>> + { >>>> + /* A generic CPU providing MIPS32 Release 5 features. >>>> + FIXME: Eventually this should be replaced by a real CPU model. */ >>> >>> That is not really possible. QEMU needs to keep command line backwards >>> compatibility, so if you add a generic model now, we will need to live >>> with the generic model for a long time. What's the difficulty with >>> taking "a real CPU model"? Is there no silicon yet or just a code name >>> rather than a marketing name? >> >> Good point, though I notice we have two MIPS CPUs already >> with this same 'FIXME' comment about being generic. > > So before I apply the pull request with this patch, does > anybody want to actually object to adding another 'generic' > MIPS CPU to the two we have already? It seems reasonable > enough to me. No objection from my side. I was however expecting Petar to drop the FIXME in response to my reply, which I believe was still in the PULL. Peter, are you planning (or did I miss) a follow-up cleaning that up, whether for your new model or for all? Regards, Andreas
diff --git a/target-mips/mips-defs.h b/target-mips/mips-defs.h index bf094a3..9dfa516 100644 --- a/target-mips/mips-defs.h +++ b/target-mips/mips-defs.h @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ #define ISA_MIPS32R2 0x00000040 #define ISA_MIPS64 0x00000080 #define ISA_MIPS64R2 0x00000100 +#define ISA_MIPS32R3 0x00000200 +#define ISA_MIPS32R5 0x00000400 /* MIPS ASEs. */ #define ASE_MIPS16 0x00001000 @@ -64,6 +66,12 @@ #define CPU_MIPS32R2 (CPU_MIPS32 | ISA_MIPS32R2) #define CPU_MIPS64R2 (CPU_MIPS64 | CPU_MIPS32R2 | ISA_MIPS64R2) +/* MIPS Technologies "Release 3" */ +#define CPU_MIPS32R3 (CPU_MIPS32R2 | ISA_MIPS32R3) + +/* MIPS Technologies "Release 5" */ +#define CPU_MIPS32R5 (CPU_MIPS32R3 | ISA_MIPS32R5) + /* Strictly follow the architecture standard: - Disallow "special" instruction handling for PMON/SPIM. Note that we still maintain Count/Compare to match the host clock. */ diff --git a/target-mips/translate_init.c b/target-mips/translate_init.c index c45b1b2..d74a0af 100644 --- a/target-mips/translate_init.c +++ b/target-mips/translate_init.c @@ -333,6 +333,31 @@ static const mips_def_t mips_defs[] = .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R2 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, }, + { + /* A generic CPU providing MIPS32 Release 5 features. + FIXME: Eventually this should be replaced by a real CPU model. */ + .name = "mips32r5-generic", + .CP0_PRid = 0x00019700, + .CP0_Config0 = MIPS_CONFIG0 | (0x1 << CP0C0_AR) | + (MMU_TYPE_R4000 << CP0C0_MT), + .CP0_Config1 = MIPS_CONFIG1 | (1 << CP0C1_FP) | (15 << CP0C1_MMU) | + (0 << CP0C1_IS) | (3 << CP0C1_IL) | (1 << CP0C1_IA) | + (0 << CP0C1_DS) | (3 << CP0C1_DL) | (1 << CP0C1_DA) | + (1 << CP0C1_CA), + .CP0_Config2 = MIPS_CONFIG2, + .CP0_Config3 = MIPS_CONFIG3, + .CP0_LLAddr_rw_bitmask = 0, + .CP0_LLAddr_shift = 4, + .SYNCI_Step = 32, + .CCRes = 2, + .CP0_Status_rw_bitmask = 0x3778FF1F, + .CP1_fcr0 = (1 << FCR0_F64) | (1 << FCR0_L) | (1 << FCR0_W) | + (1 << FCR0_D) | (1 << FCR0_S) | (0x93 << FCR0_PRID), + .SEGBITS = 32, + .PABITS = 32, + .insn_flags = CPU_MIPS32R5 | ASE_MIPS16 | ASE_DSP | ASE_DSPR2, + .mmu_type = MMU_TYPE_R4000, + }, #if defined(TARGET_MIPS64) { .name = "R4000",