Message ID | 52D4A2C8.3000908@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:36:56AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote: >If the slave's name changed, and the bond params primary is exist, >the bond should deal with the situation in two ways: > >1) If the slave is the primary slave yet, clean the primary slave > and reselect active slave. >2) If the slave's new name is as same as bond primary, set the slave > as primary slave and reselect active slave. > >Thanks for Veaceslav's suggestion. > >Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> As in my previous email - please, don't use my name until I say so. I'll add my signed-off-by to any patch that I've worked enough on. >Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> >--- > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >index e06c445..63d6533 100644 >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >@@ -2860,9 +2860,35 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event, > */ > break; > case NETDEV_CHANGENAME: >- /* >- * TODO: handle changing the primary's name >+ /* Handle changing the slave's name: >+ * 1) If the slave is primary save yet, >+ * clean the primary slave and reselect >+ * active slave. I usually don't mind bad english (as I myself am speaking quite horrible one), but I can't really understand what you've meant here. And given that it's a comment in code - please, proof-read it first. >+ * 2) If the slave's new name is bond >+ * primary, set the slave as primary >+ * slave and reselect active slave. > */ >+ if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && >+ bond->params.primary[0]) { Too many indentions. Verify if we're not using primary or primary string name is null and break, otherwise go further. >+ if (bond->primary_slave && >+ slave == bond->primary_slave) { Useless verification, slave can't be NULL. >+ pr_info("%s: Setting primary slave to None.\n", >+ bond->dev->name); >+ bond->primary_slave = NULL; >+ write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >+ bond_select_active_slave(bond); Get bond_select_active_slave() out of if()s, you use it twice here. >+ write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >+ } else if (!bond->primary_slave && Useless verification, if the name of a slave changed to our params.primary - then it means that bond->primary_slave was NULL, as it can only be not-null when we have a matching interface, and that would mean that we have two interfaces with the same name. >+ !strcmp(bond->params.primary, >+ slave_dev->name)) { >+ pr_info("%s: Setting %s as primary slave.\n", >+ bond->dev->name, slave_dev->name); >+ bond->primary_slave = slave; >+ write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >+ bond_select_active_slave(bond); >+ write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >+ } >+ } > break; > case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE: > bond_compute_features(bond); >-- >1.8.0 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2014/1/14 14:38, Veaceslav Falico wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:36:56AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> If the slave's name changed, and the bond params primary is exist, >> the bond should deal with the situation in two ways: >> >> 1) If the slave is the primary slave yet, clean the primary slave >> and reselect active slave. >> 2) If the slave's new name is as same as bond primary, set the slave >> as primary slave and reselect active slave. >> >> Thanks for Veaceslav's suggestion. >> >> Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> > > As in my previous email - please, don't use my name until I say so. > > I'll add my signed-off-by to any patch that I've worked enough on. > >> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> index e06c445..63d6533 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> @@ -2860,9 +2860,35 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event, >> */ >> break; >> case NETDEV_CHANGENAME: >> - /* >> - * TODO: handle changing the primary's name >> + /* Handle changing the slave's name: >> + * 1) If the slave is primary save yet, >> + * clean the primary slave and reselect >> + * active slave. > > I usually don't mind bad english (as I myself am speaking quite horrible > one), but I can't really understand what you've meant here. And given that > it's a comment in code - please, proof-read it first. > >> + * 2) If the slave's new name is bond >> + * primary, set the slave as primary >> + * slave and reselect active slave. >> */ >> + if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && >> + bond->params.primary[0]) { > > Too many indentions. Verify if we're not using primary or primary string > name is null and break, otherwise go further. > >> + if (bond->primary_slave && >> + slave == bond->primary_slave) { > > Useless verification, slave can't be NULL. > >> + pr_info("%s: Setting primary slave to None.\n", >> + bond->dev->name); >> + bond->primary_slave = NULL; >> + write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >> + bond_select_active_slave(bond); > > Get bond_select_active_slave() out of if()s, you use it twice here. > >> + write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >> + } else if (!bond->primary_slave && > > Useless verification, if the name of a slave changed to our params.primary > - then it means that bond->primary_slave was NULL, as it can only be > not-null when we have a matching interface, and that would mean that we > have two interfaces with the same name. > >> + !strcmp(bond->params.primary, >> + slave_dev->name)) { >> + pr_info("%s: Setting %s as primary slave.\n", >> + bond->dev->name, slave_dev->name); >> + bond->primary_slave = slave; >> + write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >> + bond_select_active_slave(bond); >> + write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); >> + } >> + } >> break; >> case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE: >> bond_compute_features(bond); >> -- >> 1.8.0 >> >> > fix in v2, thanks. Regards Ding > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index e06c445..63d6533 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -2860,9 +2860,35 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event, */ break; case NETDEV_CHANGENAME: - /* - * TODO: handle changing the primary's name + /* Handle changing the slave's name: + * 1) If the slave is primary save yet, + * clean the primary slave and reselect + * active slave. + * 2) If the slave's new name is bond + * primary, set the slave as primary + * slave and reselect active slave. */ + if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && + bond->params.primary[0]) { + if (bond->primary_slave && + slave == bond->primary_slave) { + pr_info("%s: Setting primary slave to None.\n", + bond->dev->name); + bond->primary_slave = NULL; + write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); + bond_select_active_slave(bond); + write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); + } else if (!bond->primary_slave && + !strcmp(bond->params.primary, + slave_dev->name)) { + pr_info("%s: Setting %s as primary slave.\n", + bond->dev->name, slave_dev->name); + bond->primary_slave = slave; + write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); + bond_select_active_slave(bond); + write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); + } + } break; case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE: bond_compute_features(bond);
If the slave's name changed, and the bond params primary is exist, the bond should deal with the situation in two ways: 1) If the slave is the primary slave yet, clean the primary slave and reselect active slave. 2) If the slave's new name is as same as bond primary, set the slave as primary slave and reselect active slave. Thanks for Veaceslav's suggestion. Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)