Message ID | Pine.LNX.4.64.0908051434110.20453@pc-004.diku.dk |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:34:34 +0200 (CEST) > Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form > AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well. Also the values of > PF_INET and AF_INET are the same. > > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) .. > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> This is obvious enough that I've just tossed it into net-next-2.6 Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff -u -p a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c --- a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c +++ b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int __init rds_rdma_listen_init(v goto out; } - sin.sin_family = PF_INET, + sin.sin_family = AF_INET, sin.sin_addr.s_addr = (__force u32)htonl(INADDR_ANY); sin.sin_port = (__force u16)htons(RDS_PORT);