diff mbox

[net-next,v2,15/20] net: seeq: slight optimization of addr compare

Message ID 52BE6D1C.5090101@huawei.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Ding Tianhong Dec. 28, 2013, 6:18 a.m. UTC 
Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
to instead of memcmp.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
index c765718..ced5b13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@  static inline void sgiseeq_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct sgiseeq_private *sp
 		if (pkt_status & SEEQ_RSTAT_FIG) {
 			/* Packet is OK. */
 			/* We don't want to receive our own packets */
-			if (memcmp(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN)) {
+			if (!ether_addr_equal(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr)) {
 				if (len > rx_copybreak) {
 					skb = rd->skb;
 					newskb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, PKT_BUF_SZ);