@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
{ .name = "any", .initfn = aarch64_any_initfn },
#endif
+ { .name = NULL } /* TODO: drop when we support more CPUs */
};
static void aarch64_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
@@ -100,6 +101,11 @@ static void aarch64_cpu_register(const ARMCPUInfo *info)
.class_init = info->class_init,
};
+ /* TODO: drop when we support more CPUs - all entries will have name set */
+ if (!info->name) {
+ return;
+ }
+
type_info.name = g_strdup_printf("%s-" TYPE_ARM_CPU, info->name);
type_register(&type_info);
g_free((void *)type_info.name);
commit 5ce4f35781028ce1aee3341e6002f925fdc7aaf3 "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method" introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY. In particular an attempt to iterate over this array produces a warning under gcc 4.8.2: CC aarch64-softmmu/target-arm/cpu64.o /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c: In function ‘aarch64_cpu_register_types’: /scm/qemu/target-arm/cpu64.c:124:5: error: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Werror=type-limits] for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(aarch64_cpus); i++) { ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors This is the result of ARRAY_SIZE being an unsigned type, causing "i" to be promoted to unsigned int as well. As zero size arrays are a gcc extension, it seems cleanest to add a dummy element with NULL name, and test for it during registration. We'll be able to drop this when we add more CPUs. Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> --- target-arm/cpu64.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)