diff mbox

[net-next,v2,11/16] i40e: remove chatty log messages

Message ID 1387557965-13241-12-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Kirsher, Jeffrey T Dec. 20, 2013, 4:46 p.m. UTC
From: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>

Don't complain when we disable queues that are already disable, or
enable them when they're already enabled. This removes a bunch of bogus
log messages that we see at every VF reset.

Change-Id: Ia127be572abdccc48a53d8c43f8a07b8bb920de1
Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 16 +++-------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Mitch Williams Dec. 20, 2013, 5:40 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 10:18 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@davemloft.net; Williams, Mitch A
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com;
> Brandeburg, Jesse
> Subject: Re: [net-next v2 11/16] i40e: remove chatty log messages
> 
> On 12/20/2013 07:46 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> 
> > From: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> 
> > Don't complain when we disable queues that are already disable, or
> > enable them when they're already enabled. This removes a bunch of bogus
> > log messages that we see at every VF reset.
> 
> > Change-Id: Ia127be572abdccc48a53d8c43f8a07b8bb920de1
> > Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 16 +++-------------
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > index c0f78bc..38e07e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi
> *vsi, bool enable)
> >   		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
> >   			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) & 1);
> >
> > -		if (enable) {
> > -			/* is STAT set ? */
> > -			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > -					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
> > +		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> > +		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> >   				continue;
> 
>     This line seems over-indented now.
> 
> > -			}
> > -		} else {
> > -			/* is !STAT set ? */
> > -			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > -					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
> > +		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> >   				continue;
> 
>     This one too.
> 
> WBR, Sergei

Sergei, if you look at the source instead of the patch, you'll see that these are correct. The whole thing is inside a for loop, so it should properly be indented two tabs.

-Mitch

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joe Perches Dec. 20, 2013, 5:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 17:40 +0000, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
[]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
[]
> > > @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi
> > *vsi, bool enable)
> > >   		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
> > >   			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) & 1);
> > >
> > > -		if (enable) {
> > > -			/* is STAT set ? */
> > > -			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > -					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
> > > +		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> > > +		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > >   				continue;
> > 
> >     This line seems over-indented now.
> > 
> > > -			}
> > > -		} else {
> > > -			/* is !STAT set ? */
> > > -			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > -					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
> > > +		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > >   				continue;
> > 
> >     This one too.
[]
> Sergei, if you look at the source instead of the patch, you'll see
> that these are correct. The whole thing is inside a for loop, so it
> should properly be indented two tabs.

I looked at the source.
Both continue statements _are_ overly indented.
4 tabs should be 3.

Also, this code is inconsistent and might be
nicer using the same form:

		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
			continue;
		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
			continue;

[...]

		/* wait for the change to finish */
		for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
			tx_reg = rd32(hw, I40E_QTX_ENA(pf_q));
			if (enable) {
				if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
					break;
			} else {
				if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
					break;
			}

Perhaps the first form should be like the second

	if (enable) {
		if (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)
			continue;
	} else {
		if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
			continue;
	}

or maybe both should be

	bool mask = tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK;
	if (enable ^ mask)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mitch Williams Dec. 20, 2013, 6 p.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Williams, Mitch A
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: Sergei Shtylyov; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@davemloft.net
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com;
> Brandeburg, Jesse
> Subject: RE: [net-next v2 11/16] i40e: remove chatty log messages
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 10:18 AM
> > To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@davemloft.net; Williams, Mitch A
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com;
> > Brandeburg, Jesse
> > Subject: Re: [net-next v2 11/16] i40e: remove chatty log messages
> >
> > On 12/20/2013 07:46 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >
> > > From: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> >
> > > Don't complain when we disable queues that are already disable, or
> > > enable them when they're already enabled. This removes a bunch of bogus
> > > log messages that we see at every VF reset.
> >
> > > Change-Id: Ia127be572abdccc48a53d8c43f8a07b8bb920de1
> > > Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 16 +++-------------
> > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > index c0f78bc..38e07e6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > > @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi
> > *vsi, bool enable)
> > >   		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
> > >   			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) &
> 1);
> > >
> > > -		if (enable) {
> > > -			/* is STAT set ? */
> > > -			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > -					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
> > > +		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> > > +		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > >   				continue;
> >
> >     This line seems over-indented now.
> >
> > > -			}
> > > -		} else {
> > > -			/* is !STAT set ? */
> > > -			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > -					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
> > > +		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > >   				continue;
> >
> >     This one too.
> >
> > WBR, Sergei
> 
> Sergei, if you look at the source instead of the patch, you'll see that
> these are correct. The whole thing is inside a for loop, so it should
> properly be indented two tabs.
> 
> -Mitch

Doh! Jeff pointed out to me that you are indeed correct, Sergei. I was looking at the if lines, not the continue lines. We'll fix this.

-Mitch

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Kirsher, Jeffrey T Dec. 20, 2013, 6 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 09:59 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 17:40 +0000, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
> []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> []
> > > > @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct
> i40e_vsi
> > > *vsi, bool enable)
> > > >                   } while (j-- && ((tx_reg >>
> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
> > > >                                  ^ (tx_reg >>
> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) & 1);
> > > >
> > > > -         if (enable) {
> > > > -                 /* is STAT set ? */
> > > > -                 if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > > -                         dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > > -                                  "Tx %d already enabled\n",
> i);
> > > > +         /* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state
> */
> > > > +         if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > > >                                   continue;
> > > 
> > >     This line seems over-indented now.
> > > 
> > > > -                 }
> > > > -         } else {
> > > > -                 /* is !STAT set ? */
> > > > -                 if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > > -                         dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > > -                                  "Tx %d already disabled\n",
> i);
> > > > +         if (!enable && !(tx_reg &
> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > > >                                   continue;
> > > 
> > >     This one too.
> []
> > Sergei, if you look at the source instead of the patch, you'll see
> > that these are correct. The whole thing is inside a for loop, so it
> > should properly be indented two tabs.
> 
> I looked at the source.
> Both continue statements _are_ overly indented.
> 4 tabs should be 3.
> 
> Also, this code is inconsistent and might be
> nicer using the same form:
> 
>                 /* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state
> */
>                 if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
>                         continue;
>                 if (!enable && !(tx_reg &
> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
>                         continue;

Sergei was right.  I will get this fixed up and re-submit v3.
Mitch Williams Dec. 20, 2013, 6:04 p.m. UTC | #5
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 9:59 AM
> To: Williams, Mitch A
> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; davem@davemloft.net;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; gospo@redhat.com; sassmann@redhat.com; Brandeburg,
> Jesse
> Subject: Re: [net-next v2 11/16] i40e: remove chatty log messages
> 
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 17:40 +0000, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sergei Shtylyov [mailto:sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com]
> []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> []
> > > > @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi
> > > *vsi, bool enable)
> > > >   		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
> > > >   			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) &
> 1);
> > > >
> > > > -		if (enable) {
> > > > -			/* is STAT set ? */
> > > > -			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > > -					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
> > > > +		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> > > > +		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > > >   				continue;
> > >
> > >     This line seems over-indented now.
> > >
> > > > -			}
> > > > -		} else {
> > > > -			/* is !STAT set ? */
> > > > -			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> > > > -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> > > > -					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
> > > > +		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > > >   				continue;
> > >
> > >     This one too.
> []
> > Sergei, if you look at the source instead of the patch, you'll see
> > that these are correct. The whole thing is inside a for loop, so it
> > should properly be indented two tabs.
> 
> I looked at the source.
> Both continue statements _are_ overly indented.
> 4 tabs should be 3.
> 
> Also, this code is inconsistent and might be
> nicer using the same form:
> 
> 		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> 		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> 			continue;
> 		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> 			continue;
> 
> [...]
> 
> 		/* wait for the change to finish */
> 		for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
> 			tx_reg = rd32(hw, I40E_QTX_ENA(pf_q));
> 			if (enable) {
> 				if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> 					break;
> 			} else {
> 				if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> 					break;
> 			}
> 
> Perhaps the first form should be like the second
> 
> 	if (enable) {
> 		if (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)
> 			continue;
> 	} else {
> 		if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> 			continue;
> 	}
> 
> or maybe both should be
> 
> 	bool mask = tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK;
> 	if (enable ^ mask)
> 

Yeah, I see the messed up indent now. Jeff's going to fix and resend.

I see what you mean about the inconsistent logic. Since it's not crucial, I think I'd prefer to fix this in a separate patch in the future. (I'll implement it today, but it takes a while to get through our internal validation process.)

-Mitch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sergei Shtylyov Dec. 20, 2013, 6:18 p.m. UTC | #6
On 12/20/2013 07:46 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:

> From: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>

> Don't complain when we disable queues that are already disable, or
> enable them when they're already enabled. This removes a bunch of bogus
> log messages that we see at every VF reset.

> Change-Id: Ia127be572abdccc48a53d8c43f8a07b8bb920de1
> Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Kavindya Deegala <kavindya.s.deegala@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 16 +++-------------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> index c0f78bc..38e07e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> @@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@ static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, bool enable)
>   		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
>   			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) & 1);
>
> -		if (enable) {
> -			/* is STAT set ? */
> -			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> -					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
> +		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> +		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
>   				continue;

    This line seems over-indented now.

> -			}
> -		} else {
> -			/* is !STAT set ? */
> -			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
> -				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
> -					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
> +		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
>   				continue;

    This one too.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Joe Perches Dec. 20, 2013, 6:31 p.m. UTC | #7
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 18:04 +0000, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
[]
> > this code is inconsistent and might be
> > nicer using the same form:
> > 
> > 		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
> > 		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > 			continue;
> > 		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > 			continue;
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > 		/* wait for the change to finish */
> > 		for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
> > 			tx_reg = rd32(hw, I40E_QTX_ENA(pf_q));
> > 			if (enable) {
> > 				if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > 					break;
> > 			} else {
> > 				if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > 					break;
> > 			}
> > 
> > Perhaps the first form should be like the second
> > 
> > 	if (enable) {
> > 		if (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)
> > 			continue;
> > 	} else {
> > 		if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
> > 			continue;
> > 	}
> > 
> > or maybe both should be
> > 
> > 	bool mask = tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK;
> > 	if (enable ^ mask)
[]
> I see what you mean about the inconsistent logic. Since it's not
> crucial, I think I'd prefer to fix this in a separate patch in the
> future. (I'll implement it today, but it takes a while to get through
> our internal validation process.)

Whenever, no worries, it's just a nit.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index c0f78bc..38e07e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -2988,21 +2988,11 @@  static int i40e_vsi_control_tx(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, bool enable)
 		} while (j-- && ((tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_REQ_SHIFT)
 			       ^ (tx_reg >> I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_SHIFT)) & 1);
 
-		if (enable) {
-			/* is STAT set ? */
-			if ((tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
-				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
-					 "Tx %d already enabled\n", i);
+		/* Skip if the queue is already in the requested state */
+		if (enable && (tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
 				continue;
-			}
-		} else {
-			/* is !STAT set ? */
-			if (!(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK)) {
-				dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
-					 "Tx %d already disabled\n", i);
+		if (!enable && !(tx_reg & I40E_QTX_ENA_QENA_STAT_MASK))
 				continue;
-			}
-		}
 
 		/* turn on/off the queue */
 		if (enable)