Patchwork [GIT,PULL] Xilinx Zynq clk changes for v3.14

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Michal Simek
Date Dec. 18, 2013, 9:26 a.m.
Message ID <52B16A4B.1000706@monstr.eu>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/302749/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.14

Comments

Michal Simek - Dec. 18, 2013, 9:26 a.m.
Hi Mike,

As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
should go to v3.14.

Thanks,
Michal


The following changes since commit dc1ccc48159d63eca5089e507c82c7d22ef60839:

  Linux 3.13-rc2 (2013-11-29 12:57:14 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.14

for you to fetch changes up to eda9488d741085f79318884690db139712a1b019:

  arm: dt: zynq: Add fclk-enable property to clkc node (2013-12-11 17:48:48 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: Xilinx Zynq clk patches for v3.14

- Add support for fclk-enable feature

----------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Brinkmann (2):
      clk/zynq/clkc: Add 'fclk-enable' feature
      arm: dt: zynq: Add fclk-enable property to clkc node

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/zynq-7000.txt |  4 ++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi                      |  1 +
 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c                               | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Mike Turquette - Dec. 19, 2013, 5:12 a.m.
Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 01:26:35)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
> That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
> should go to v3.14.

Michal,

Thanks much for the pull request. In the future it is a bit easier if
you base your pull request on the tip of clk-next, but it's not a big
deal.

Shouldn't the change to zynq-7000.dtsi go through the arm-soc tree
instead of the clk tree?

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit dc1ccc48159d63eca5089e507c82c7d22ef60839:
> 
>   Linux 3.13-rc2 (2013-11-29 12:57:14 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.14
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to eda9488d741085f79318884690db139712a1b019:
> 
>   arm: dt: zynq: Add fclk-enable property to clkc node (2013-12-11 17:48:48 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> arm: Xilinx Zynq clk patches for v3.14
> 
> - Add support for fclk-enable feature
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Soren Brinkmann (2):
>       clk/zynq/clkc: Add 'fclk-enable' feature
>       arm: dt: zynq: Add fclk-enable property to clkc node
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/zynq-7000.txt |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi                      |  1 +
>  drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c                               | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
> 
>
Michal Simek - Dec. 19, 2013, 7:37 a.m.
Hi Mike,

On 12/19/2013 06:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 01:26:35)
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
>> That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
>> should go to v3.14.
> 
> Michal,
> 
> Thanks much for the pull request. In the future it is a bit easier if
> you base your pull request on the tip of clk-next, but it's not a big
> deal.

ok. No problem to do.

> 
> Shouldn't the change to zynq-7000.dtsi go through the arm-soc tree
> instead of the clk tree?

It is here because it is related to clock and there is no conflict
with others DT changes we made for 3.14.
But if you prefer not to have this change here I have no problem
to add it to our zynq/clk branch and go through arm-soc tree.

Thanks,
Michal
Mike Turquette - Dec. 19, 2013, 7:26 p.m.
Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 23:37:17)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On 12/19/2013 06:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 01:26:35)
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
> >> That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
> >> should go to v3.14.
> > 
> > Michal,
> > 
> > Thanks much for the pull request. In the future it is a bit easier if
> > you base your pull request on the tip of clk-next, but it's not a big
> > deal.
> 
> ok. No problem to do.
> 
> > 
> > Shouldn't the change to zynq-7000.dtsi go through the arm-soc tree
> > instead of the clk tree?
> 
> It is here because it is related to clock and there is no conflict
> with others DT changes we made for 3.14.
> But if you prefer not to have this change here I have no problem
> to add it to our zynq/clk branch and go through arm-soc tree.

I think it is better to take the dts patch through arm-soc. Merge
conflicts seem unlikely now, but it's best to err on the side of caution
and send that patch through the correct tree.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> -- 
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
> 
>
Michal Simek - Dec. 20, 2013, 12:29 p.m.
On 12/19/2013 08:26 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 23:37:17)
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 12/19/2013 06:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Michal Simek (2013-12-18 01:26:35)
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> As we discussed it is better for you to get pull request with signed tags.
>>>> That's why I am sending you pull request for 2 patches which we have in queue which
>>>> should go to v3.14.
>>>
>>> Michal,
>>>
>>> Thanks much for the pull request. In the future it is a bit easier if
>>> you base your pull request on the tip of clk-next, but it's not a big
>>> deal.
>>
>> ok. No problem to do.
>>
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the change to zynq-7000.dtsi go through the arm-soc tree
>>> instead of the clk tree?
>>
>> It is here because it is related to clock and there is no conflict
>> with others DT changes we made for 3.14.
>> But if you prefer not to have this change here I have no problem
>> to add it to our zynq/clk branch and go through arm-soc tree.
> 
> I think it is better to take the dts patch through arm-soc. Merge
> conflicts seem unlikely now, but it's best to err on the side of caution
> and send that patch through the correct tree.

ok. No problem with that.

Will send you new pull request based on clk-next branch.

Thanks,
Michal