Patchwork arm-soc: Xilinx Zynq dt changes for v3.14

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Michal Simek
Date Dec. 13, 2013, 8:33 a.m.
Message ID <52AAC671.6000207@monstr.eu>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/300936/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-dt-for-3.14

Comments

Michal Simek - Dec. 13, 2013, 8:33 a.m.
Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,

Please pull these dt changes to your tree.

Thanks,
Michal


The following changes since commit dc1ccc48159d63eca5089e507c82c7d22ef60839:

  Linux 3.13-rc2 (2013-11-29 12:57:14 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-dt-for-3.14

for you to fetch changes up to 41e4cdb95efa7e8fc88c65cb3c7221e89b9efb49:

  arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node (2013-12-12 09:50:23 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: Xilinx Zynq dt patches for v3.14

- Add gem support
- Add cpus node
- TTC cleanup

----------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Brinkmann (2):
      arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
      arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node

Steffen Trumtrar (1):
      ARM: zynq: add gem support

 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts |  5 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts |  5 +++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts   |  5 +++++
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Russell King - ARM Linux - Dec. 13, 2013, 11:26 a.m.
1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
   individually.  The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches
   the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
   you send your email without you needing to know who they are.

2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
   a pull request message.

Thanks.
Michal Simek - Dec. 13, 2013, 1:25 p.m.
Hi Russell,

On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
>    individually.  The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches
>    the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
>    you send your email without you needing to know who they are.
> 
> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
>    a pull request message.

Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done
before and this is the first complain I have got.

Thanks,
Michal
Olof Johansson - Dec. 17, 2013, 8:27 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
> >    individually.  The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches
> >    the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
> >    you send your email without you needing to know who they are.
> > 
> > 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
> >    a pull request message.
> 
> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done
> before and this is the first complain I have got.

I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a
friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.


-Olof
Michal Simek - Dec. 18, 2013, 9:06 a.m.
On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
>>>    individually.  The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches
>>>    the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
>>>    you send your email without you needing to know who they are.
>>>
>>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
>>>    a pull request message.
>>
>> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done
>> before and this is the first complain I have got.
> 
> I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a
> friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.

that's how I take it.
The point here is just if I should send pull request again.

Thanks,
Michal
Kevin Hilman - Dec. 20, 2013, 4:34 p.m.
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> writes:

> On 12/17/2013 09:27 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:25:17PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi Russell,
>>>
>>> On 12/13/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> 1. Address it to arm@kernel.org; there's no need to copy arm-soc people
>>>>    individually.  The whole point of arm@kernel.org is that it reaches
>>>>    the current arm-soc maintainers, whoever they may be at the time that
>>>>    you send your email without you needing to know who they are.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Include in the subject line not "arm-soc:" but [GIT PULL] to mark it as
>>>>    a pull request message.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I will keep this in my mind for future. I am just doing what I have done
>>> before and this is the first complain I have got.
>> 
>> I don't think I've noticed it in the past. :-) Either way, see it as a
>> friendly pointer from Russell, not a complaint.
>
> that's how I take it.
> The point here is just if I should send pull request again.

No need to send again.

Kevin
Olof Johansson - Dec. 22, 2013, 7:37 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,
> 
> Please pull these dt changes to your tree.

Pulled, however:

> Soren Brinkmann (2):
>       arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
>       arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node
> 
> Steffen Trumtrar (1):
>       ARM: zynq: add gem support

Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to:

ARM: <platform>: <...>


-Olof
Soren Brinkmann - Dec. 27, 2013, 4:43 a.m.
Hi Olof,

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:37:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof,
> > 
> > Please pull these dt changes to your tree.
> 
> Pulled, however:
> 
> > Soren Brinkmann (2):
> >       arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes
> >       arm: dt: zynq: Add 'cpus' node
> > 
> > Steffen Trumtrar (1):
> >       ARM: zynq: add gem support
> 
> Minor nit: Please be consistent with patch subjects. We try to stick to:
> 
> ARM: <platform>: <...>

I'll keep that in mind for future submissions,

	Thanks,
	Sören