diff mbox

mtd: nand: gpio: Remove unneeded CONFIG_OF

Message ID 1386427686-30190-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Ezequiel Garcia Dec. 7, 2013, 2:48 p.m. UTC
Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.

Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexander Shiyan Dec. 7, 2013, 2:54 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello.

> Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
> to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.
> 
> Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
...
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  static const struct of_device_id gpio_nand_id_table[] = {

You should add "__maybe_unused" attribute here in this case.
This will avoid warning when you build driver without OF.

---
Ezequiel Garcia Dec. 7, 2013, 3:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:54:32PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> > Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
> > to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.
> > 
> > Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> ...
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> >  static const struct of_device_id gpio_nand_id_table[] = {
> 
> You should add "__maybe_unused" attribute here in this case.
> This will avoid warning when you build driver without OF.
> 
> ---

I don't get such warning, maybe because the GCC is smart enough
to remove the symbol?

Actually, I realise now we don't need to of_match_ptr, so let
me push a v2.
Alexander Shiyan Dec. 7, 2013, 3:35 p.m. UTC | #3
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:54:32PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > > Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
> > > to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > ...
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > >  static const struct of_device_id gpio_nand_id_table[] = {
> > 
> > You should add "__maybe_unused" attribute here in this case.
> > This will avoid warning when you build driver without OF.
> > 
> > ---
> 
> I don't get such warning, maybe because the GCC is smart enough
> to remove the symbol?
> 
> Actually, I realise now we don't need to of_match_ptr, so let
> me push a v2.

And without of_match_ptr() we do not need to define "__maybe_unused" for this :)

---
Ezequiel Garcia Dec. 7, 2013, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 07:35:49PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 06:54:32PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > > Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
> > > > to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > > ...
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > >  static const struct of_device_id gpio_nand_id_table[] = {
> > > 
> > > You should add "__maybe_unused" attribute here in this case.
> > > This will avoid warning when you build driver without OF.
> > > 
> > > ---
> > 
> > I don't get such warning, maybe because the GCC is smart enough
> > to remove the symbol?
> > 
> > Actually, I realise now we don't need to of_match_ptr, so let
> > me push a v2.
> 
> And without of_match_ptr() we do not need to define "__maybe_unused" for this :)
> 

Yup :-)

Care to give the v2 a test? I've just submitted it.

Thanks!
Alexander Shiyan Dec. 7, 2013, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #5
> > > > > Since the of_mtd header provides dummy stubs for !CONFIG_OF, it's safe
> > > > > to remove the #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Build tested only.
...
> > > Actually, I realise now we don't need to of_match_ptr, so let
> > > me push a v2.
> > 
> > And without of_match_ptr() we do not need to define "__maybe_unused" for this :)
> > 
> Yup :-)
> 
> Care to give the v2 a test? I've just submitted it.

I see. Looks good, compile test is enough for such changes.

---
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c
index e826f89..8010975 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpio.c
@@ -94,7 +94,6 @@  static int gpio_nand_devready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	return gpio_get_value(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_rdy);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static const struct of_device_id gpio_nand_id_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "gpio-control-nand" },
 	{}
@@ -145,19 +144,6 @@  static struct resource *gpio_nand_get_io_sync_of(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	return r;
 }
-#else /* CONFIG_OF */
-static inline int gpio_nand_get_config_of(const struct device *dev,
-					  struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
-{
-	return -ENOSYS;
-}
-
-static inline struct resource *
-gpio_nand_get_io_sync_of(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-	return NULL;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
 
 static inline int gpio_nand_get_config(const struct device *dev,
 				       struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)