Patchwork [3.11.y.z,extended,stable] Patch "xfs: be more forgiving of a v4 secondary sb w/ junk in v5 fields" has been added to staging queue

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Luis Henriques
Date Dec. 5, 2013, 11:27 a.m.
Message ID <1386242837-4640-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/297060/
State New
Headers show

Comments

Luis Henriques - Dec. 5, 2013, 11:27 a.m.
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    xfs: be more forgiving of a v4 secondary sb w/ junk in v5 fields

to the linux-3.11.y-queue branch of the 3.11.y.z extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.11.y-queue

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.11.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Luis

------

From 4ca70e5954382819b877003daa2339819c4bab95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 15:33:29 -0500
Subject: xfs: be more forgiving of a v4 secondary sb w/ junk in v5 fields

commit 10e6e65dfcedff63275c3d649d329c044caa8e26 upstream.

Today, if xfs_sb_read_verify encounters a v4 superblock
with junk past v4 fields which includes data in sb_crc,
it will be treated as a failing checksum and a significant
corruption.

There are known prior bugs which leave junk at the end
of the V4 superblock; we don't need to actually fail the
verification in this case if other checks pan out ok.

So if this is a secondary superblock, and the primary
superblock doesn't indicate that this is a V5 filesystem,
don't treat this as an actual checksum failure.

We should probably check the garbage condition as
we do in xfs_repair, and possibly warn about it
or self-heal, but that's a different scope of work.

Stable folks: This can go back to v3.10, which is what
introduced the sb CRC checking that is tripped up by old,
stale, incorrect V4 superblocks w/ unzeroed bits.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.5:
  - xfs_sb_read_verify() is defined in fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c in 3.11 ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
1.8.3.2

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 2b0ba35..fd078b7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -749,6 +749,11 @@  xfs_sb_verify(
  * single bit error could clear the feature bit and unused parts of the
  * superblock are supposed to be zero. Hence a non-null crc field indicates that
  * we've potentially lost a feature bit and we should check it anyway.
+ *
+ * However, past bugs (i.e. in growfs) left non-zeroed regions beyond the
+ * last field in V4 secondary superblocks.  So for secondary superblocks,
+ * we are more forgiving, and ignore CRC failures if the primary doesn't
+ * indicate that the fs version is V5.
  */
 static void
 xfs_sb_read_verify(
@@ -769,8 +774,12 @@  xfs_sb_read_verify(

 		if (!xfs_verify_cksum(bp->b_addr, be16_to_cpu(dsb->sb_sectsize),
 				      offsetof(struct xfs_sb, sb_crc))) {
-			error = EFSCORRUPTED;
-			goto out_error;
+			/* Only fail bad secondaries on a known V5 filesystem */
+			if (bp->b_bn != XFS_SB_DADDR &&
+			    xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
+				error = EFSCORRUPTED;
+				goto out_error;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, true);