diff mbox

[V6,2/5] qemu-img: Add infinite loop checking in bdrv_new_open()

Message ID 1383707361-19580-3-git-send-email-gesaint@linux.vnet.ibm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Xu Wang Nov. 6, 2013, 3:09 a.m. UTC
Every image should be checked if there is infinite loop in backing
file chain before open it. So infinite loop check was added into
bdrv_new_open(). If @filename is opened without the flag
BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, the infinite loop check should be called.

Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <gesaint@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 qemu-img.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

Comments

Fam Zheng Nov. 8, 2013, 10:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 11/05 22:09, Xu Wang wrote:
> Every image should be checked if there is infinite loop in backing
> file chain before open it. So infinite loop check was added into
> bdrv_new_open(). If @filename is opened without the flag
> BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, the infinite loop check should be called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <gesaint@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I think this should be squashed into patch 1 so that the checking in
collect_image_info_list is kept along the series.

Fam

> ---
>  qemu-img.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
> index d5ec45b..3af7996 100644
> --- a/qemu-img.c
> +++ b/qemu-img.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,14 @@ static BlockDriverState *bdrv_new_open(const char *filename,
>          drv = NULL;
>      }
>  
> +    /* check backing file loop if the whole chain need to be opened */
> +    if (!(flags & BDRV_O_NO_BACKING) &&
> +        !bdrv_backing_chain_okay(filename, fmt)) {
> +        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. There is loop exists "
> +                     "in the backing chain", filename);
> +        goto fail;
> +    }
> +
>      ret = bdrv_open(bs, filename, NULL, flags, drv, &local_err);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("Could not open '%s': %s", filename,
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
>
Jeff Cody Nov. 8, 2013, 4:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:09:18PM -0500, Xu Wang wrote:
> Every image should be checked if there is infinite loop in backing
> file chain before open it. So infinite loop check was added into
> bdrv_new_open(). If @filename is opened without the flag
> BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, the infinite loop check should be called.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <gesaint@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  qemu-img.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
> index d5ec45b..3af7996 100644
> --- a/qemu-img.c
> +++ b/qemu-img.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,14 @@ static BlockDriverState *bdrv_new_open(const char *filename,
>          drv = NULL;
>      }
>  
> +    /* check backing file loop if the whole chain need to be opened */
> +    if (!(flags & BDRV_O_NO_BACKING) &&
> +        !bdrv_backing_chain_okay(filename, fmt)) {
> +        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. There is loop exists "
> +                     "in the backing chain", filename);

I suggest rewording this for grammar; something like:
 +        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. An infinite loop exists "
 +                     "in the backing chain", filename);


> +        goto fail;
> +    }
> +
>      ret = bdrv_open(bs, filename, NULL, flags, drv, &local_err);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("Could not open '%s': %s", filename,
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
>
Stefan Weil Nov. 8, 2013, 4:27 p.m. UTC | #3
See more suggestions below.

Am 08.11.2013 17:19, schrieb Jeff Cody:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 10:09:18PM -0500, Xu Wang wrote:
>> Every image should be checked if there is infinite loop in backing
>> file chain before open it. So infinite loop check was added into.

... if there is an infinite loop in the backing
file chain before opening it. ...

>> bdrv_new_open(). If @filename is opened without the flag
>> BDRV_O_NO_BACKING, the infinite loop check should be called.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <gesaint@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  qemu-img.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
>> index d5ec45b..3af7996 100644
>> --- a/qemu-img.c
>> +++ b/qemu-img.c
>> @@ -281,6 +281,14 @@ static BlockDriverState *bdrv_new_open(const char *filename,
>>          drv = NULL;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /* check backing file loop if the whole chain need to be opened */

... if the whole chain needs to be opened ...

>> +    if (!(flags & BDRV_O_NO_BACKING) &&
>> +        !bdrv_backing_chain_okay(filename, fmt)) {
>> +        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. There is loop exists "
>> +                     "in the backing chain", filename);
> I suggest rewording this for grammar; something like:
>  +        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. An infinite loop exists "
>  +                     "in the backing chain", filename);
>
>
>> +        goto fail;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      ret = bdrv_open(bs, filename, NULL, flags, drv, &local_err);
>>      if (ret < 0) {
>>          error_report("Could not open '%s': %s", filename,
>> -- 
>> 1.8.1.4
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
index d5ec45b..3af7996 100644
--- a/qemu-img.c
+++ b/qemu-img.c
@@ -281,6 +281,14 @@  static BlockDriverState *bdrv_new_open(const char *filename,
         drv = NULL;
     }
 
+    /* check backing file loop if the whole chain need to be opened */
+    if (!(flags & BDRV_O_NO_BACKING) &&
+        !bdrv_backing_chain_okay(filename, fmt)) {
+        error_report("bdrv_new_open: Open %s failed. There is loop exists "
+                     "in the backing chain", filename);
+        goto fail;
+    }
+
     ret = bdrv_open(bs, filename, NULL, flags, drv, &local_err);
     if (ret < 0) {
         error_report("Could not open '%s': %s", filename,