diff mbox

[Fortran] PR44350 - add constraint check for BLOCK DATA

Message ID 5268491F.7080302@net-b.de
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Tobias Burnus Oct. 23, 2013, 10:09 p.m. UTC 
A rather simple patch, which tries to implement Fortran 2008's C1116 
(see also PR for the wording).

While creating the patch, I found a reject-valid issue, which is now 
tracked as PR fortran/58857.

Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?

Tobias

Comments

Tobias Burnus Oct. 27, 2013, 7:42 a.m. UTC | #1 
Early *PING*

Tobias Burnus wrote:
> A rather simple patch, which tries to implement Fortran 2008's C1116 
> (see also PR for the wording).
>
> While creating the patch, I found a reject-valid issue, which is now 
> tracked as PR fortran/58857.
>
> Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
> OK for the trunk?
>
> Tobias
Paul Richard Thomas Oct. 29, 2013, 8:23 p.m. UTC | #2 
Dear Tobias,

Your patch is OK for trunk.

Thanks for the patch

Are you sure that PR58857 is valid?  If so, I stick my legs up in the
air and give up :-)

Cheers

Paul

On 24 October 2013 00:09, Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> wrote:
> A rather simple patch, which tries to implement Fortran 2008's C1116 (see
> also PR for the wording).
>
> While creating the patch, I found a reject-valid issue, which is now tracked
> as PR fortran/58857.
>
> Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
> OK for the trunk?
>
> Tobias
diff mbox

Patch

2013-10-23  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

	PR fortran/44350
	* parse.c (parse_spec): Add C1116 constraint
	check for BLOCK DATA.

2013-10-23  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

	PR fortran/44350
	* gfortran.dg/blockdata_8.f90: New.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/parse.c b/gcc/fortran/parse.c
index 512babf..e8b9885 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/parse.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/parse.c
@@ -2628,6 +2628,33 @@  loop:
 	default:
 	  break;
       }
+  else if (gfc_current_state () == COMP_BLOCK_DATA)
+    /* Fortran 2008, C1116.  */
+    switch (st)
+      {
+        case ST_DATA_DECL:
+	case ST_COMMON:
+	case ST_DATA:
+	case ST_TYPE:
+	case ST_END_BLOCK_DATA:
+	case ST_ATTR_DECL:
+	case ST_EQUIVALENCE:
+	case ST_PARAMETER:
+	case ST_IMPLICIT:
+	case ST_IMPLICIT_NONE:
+	case ST_DERIVED_DECL:
+	case ST_USE:
+	  break;
+
+	case ST_NONE:
+	  break;
+	  
+	default:
+	  gfc_error ("%s statement is not allowed inside of BLOCK DATA at %C",
+		     gfc_ascii_statement (st));
+	  reject_statement ();
+	  break;
+      }
   
   /* If we find a statement that can not be followed by an IMPLICIT statement
      (and thus we can expect to see none any further), type the function result
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/blockdata_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/blockdata_8.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d3f9925
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/blockdata_8.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ 
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! PR fortran/44350
+!
+! Fortran 2008, C1116 only permits a small subset of statements in BLOCK DATA
+!
+! Part of the test case was contributed by Vittorio Zecca
+!
+module m
+end module m
+
+BLOCK DATA valid2
+  use m
+  implicit integer(a-z)
+  intrinsic :: sin
+  common /one/ a, c
+  bind(C) :: /one/
+  dimension c(5)
+  parameter (g = 7)
+END BLOCK DATA valid2
+
+BLOCK DATA valid
+  use m
+  implicit none
+  type t
+    sequence
+  end type t
+  type(t), save :: x
+  integer  :: y
+  real :: q
+  save :: y
+  dimension :: q(5)
+!  class(*) :: zz ! See PR fortran/58857
+!  pointer :: zz
+  target :: q
+  volatile y
+  asynchronous q
+END BLOCK DATA valid
+
+block data invalid
+      common x
+      f(x)=x ! { dg-error "STATEMENT FUNCTION statement is not allowed inside of BLOCK DATA" }
+      interface ! { dg-error "INTERFACE statement is not allowed inside of BLOCK DATA" }
+      end interface
+1     format() ! { dg-error "FORMAT statement is not allowed inside of BLOCK DATA" }
+end block invalid ! { dg-error "Expecting END BLOCK DATA statement" }
+
+! { dg-error "Unexpected end of file" "" { target "*-*-*" } 0 }