Patchwork [GIT,PULL] MTD fixes for 3.12-rc

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Brian Norris
Date Oct. 9, 2013, 2:10 a.m.
Message ID <1381284622-24286-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/281699/
State Accepted
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git tags/for-linus-20131008

Comments

Brian Norris - Oct. 9, 2013, 2:10 a.m.
Hi Linus!

David Woodhouse and I have queued up a few MTD fixes for 3.12. As David seems
to be MIA again, I am sending the following pull request with his permission.

Thanks,
Brian

The following changes since commit 7b9e3a6ac00be4f3d654a711573b1794b046c22f:

  Merge tag 'fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc (2013-09-19 18:49:08 -0500)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git tags/for-linus-20131008

for you to fetch changes up to 2b468ef0e7959b703626b64c4d264ef822c9267a:

  mtd: m25p80: Fix 4 byte addressing mode for Micron devices. (2013-09-27 05:56:22 -0500)

----------------------------------------------------------------

- fix a small memory leak in some new ONFI code
- account for additional odd variations of Micron SPI flash

----------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Norris (1):
      mtd: nand: fix memory leak in ONFI extended parameter page

Elie De Brauwer (1):
      mtd: m25p80: Fix 4 byte addressing mode for Micron devices.

 drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |  8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
David Woodhouse - Oct. 9, 2013, 8:16 a.m.
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 19:10 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Linus!
> 
> David Woodhouse and I have queued up a few MTD fixes for 3.12. As David seems
> to be MIA again, I am sending the following pull request with his permission.

Not entirely MIA; just still catching up with work and sleep after being
in Portland last week. I prefer to be properly awake before sending
Linus pull requests; it saves getting shouted at :)

The pull request looks good; thanks Brian.

You should probably be signing your tags. Even if your key isn't in the
strong set yet, at least they would consistently be signed with the
*same* key.
Linus Torvalds - Oct. 10, 2013, 6:32 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:16 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> You should probably be signing your tags. Even if your key isn't in the
> strong set yet, at least they would consistently be signed with the
> *same* key.

Agreed. Even an unvalidated key is better than no key, since it can be
validated later, and even if never validated shows at least that
multiple pull requests were generated by people who had access to that
key..

              Linus