===================================================================
@@ -586,6 +586,9 @@ lto_symtab_merge_symbols (void)
FOR_EACH_SYMBOL (node)
{
cgraph_node *cnode, *cnode2;
+ varpool_node *vnode;
+ symtab_node node2;
+
if (!node->symbol.analyzed && node->symbol.alias_target)
{
symtab_node tgt = symtab_node_for_asm (node->symbol.alias_target);
@@ -594,22 +597,37 @@ lto_symtab_merge_symbols (void)
symtab_resolve_alias (node, tgt);
}
node->symbol.aux = NULL;
-
+
if (!(cnode = dyn_cast <cgraph_node> (node))
|| !cnode->clone_of
|| cnode->clone_of->symbol.decl != cnode->symbol.decl)
{
+ /* Builtins are not merged via decl merging. It is however
+ possible that tree merging unified the declaration. We
+ do not want duplicate entries in symbol table. */
if (cnode && DECL_BUILT_IN (node->symbol.decl)
&& (cnode2 = cgraph_get_node (node->symbol.decl))
&& cnode2 != cnode)
lto_cgraph_replace_node (cnode2, cnode);
+ /* The user defined assembler variables are also not unified by their
+ symbol name (since it is irrelevant), but we need to unify symbol
+ nodes if tree merging occured. */
+ if ((vnode = dyn_cast <varpool_node> (node))
+ && DECL_HARD_REGISTER (vnode->symbol.decl)
+ && (node2 = symtab_get_node (vnode->symbol.decl))
+ && node2 != node)
+ lto_varpool_replace_node (dyn_cast <varpool_node> (node2),
+ vnode);
+
+
/* Abstract functions may have duplicated cgraph nodes attached;
remove them. */
else if (cnode && DECL_ABSTRACT (cnode->symbol.decl)
&& (cnode2 = cgraph_get_node (node->symbol.decl))
&& cnode2 != cnode)
cgraph_remove_node (cnode2);
+
symtab_insert_node_to_hashtable ((symtab_node)node);
}
}
===================================================================
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ symtab_unregister_node (symtab_node node
else
*slot = replacement_node;
}
- unlink_from_assembler_name_hash (node, false);
+ if (!is_a <varpool_node> (node) || !DECL_HARD_REGISTER (node->symbol.decl))
+ unlink_from_assembler_name_hash (node, false);
}
/* Return symbol table node associated with DECL, if any,