Patchwork [v3] ACPI: Fix osc flag setup ordering to allow pcie hotplug use when available

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Neil Horman
Date Aug. 26, 2013, 3:39 p.m.
Message ID <1377531553-17716-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/269913/
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Comments

Neil Horman - Aug. 26, 2013, 3:39 p.m.
Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.

Fix is pretty simple, just defer the scan until after the osc flags have been
set on the device.  Tested by myself and it seems to work well.

Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org

---
Change notes:
v2) eferred the disabling of aspm until after the acpi scan of the pci bus is
complete.  This was done to allow proper handling of pcie 1.1 devices, as per:

commit b8178f130e25c1bdac1c33e0996f1ff6e20ec08e
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 1 15:47:39 2013 -0600

    Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"

As discussed previously in the thread the disable logic for aspm needs to be
untangled and refactored, which is not something I'm sufficently versed in teh
hotplug code to do right now, but this fixes the problem above, and prevents the
problem that necessitated the revert without adding any visible complexity to
the user, so I think its ok.

v3) Fixup stupid authorship error
---
 drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Bjorn Helgaas - Aug. 27, 2013, 9:34 p.m.
[+cc Stefan]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
> slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
> uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
> pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
> pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
> to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
> devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
> until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
> slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.

I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.

Is this a fix for problems like
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
"acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.

> Fix is pretty simple, just defer the scan until after the osc flags have been
> set on the device.  Tested by myself and it seems to work well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>
> ---
> Change notes:
> v2) eferred the disabling of aspm until after the acpi scan of the pci bus is
> complete.  This was done to allow proper handling of pcie 1.1 devices, as per:
>
> commit b8178f130e25c1bdac1c33e0996f1ff6e20ec08e
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 1 15:47:39 2013 -0600
>
>     Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"
>
> As discussed previously in the thread the disable logic for aspm needs to be
> untangled and refactored, which is not something I'm sufficently versed in teh
> hotplug code to do right now, but this fixes the problem above, and prevents the
> problem that necessitated the revert without adding any visible complexity to
> the user, so I think its ok.
>
> v3) Fixup stupid authorship error
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 5917839..1e80a90 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>         u32 flags, base_flags;
>         acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> +       bool no_aspm = false;
>
>         root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!root)
> @@ -437,27 +438,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
>         acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
>
> -       /*
> -        * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> -        */
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Scan the Root Bridge
> -        * --------------------
> -        * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> -        * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> -        * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> -        */
> -       root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> -       if (!root->bus) {
> -               dev_err(&device->dev,
> -                       "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> -                       root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> -               result = -ENODEV;
> -               goto end;
> -       }
> -
> -       /* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
>         if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
>                 flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
>         if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
> @@ -512,7 +492,14 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                                 acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
>                         dev_info(&device->dev,
>                                  "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> -                       pcie_no_aspm();
> +                       /*
> +                        * We want to disable aspm here, but aspm_disabled
> +                        * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
> +                        * properly handle pcie 1.1 devices.  So we set this
> +                        * flag here, to defer the action until after the acpi
> +                        * root scan
> +                        */
> +                       no_aspm = true;
>                 }
>         } else {
>                 dev_info(&device->dev,
> @@ -520,6 +507,29 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                          "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
>         }
>
> +       /*
> +        * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> +        */
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Scan the Root Bridge
> +        * --------------------
> +        * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> +        * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> +        * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> +        */
> +       root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> +       if (!root->bus) {
> +               dev_err(&device->dev,
> +                       "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> +                       root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> +               result = -ENODEV;
> +               goto end;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (no_aspm)
> +               pcie_no_aspm();
> +
>         pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(device, root->bus);
>         if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
>                 device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, true);
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Neil Horman - Aug. 27, 2013, 11:43 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:34:11PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Stefan]
> 
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
> > slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
> > uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
> > pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
> > pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
> > to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
> > devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
> > until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
> > slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.
> 
> I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
> is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.
> 
> Is this a fix for problems like
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
> an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
> "acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
> claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
> though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.
> 
Yes, that bug is precisely what I am trying to fix (although your wording above is
inverted from the problem in the bug).  What happens is that acpiphp claims the
pcie ports, because acpiphp init runs first, and we haven't yet parsed _OSC,
which would have told acpiphp to yield control to pciehp.  The initial fix I
proposed fixed this by parsing _OSC prior to running the acpiphp bus scan, but
that reintroduced the problem of not handling pcie 1.1 aspm properly.  That has
been fixed in v2/v3 by deferring the setting of aspm_disable until after the bus
scan.

Shall I submit a v4 with an updated changelog?

Best
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bjorn Helgaas - Aug. 28, 2013, 1:04 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:34:11PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Stefan]
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>> > Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
>> > slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
>> > uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
>> > pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
>> > pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
>> > to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
>> > devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
>> > until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
>> > slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.
>>
>> I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
>> is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.
>>
>> Is this a fix for problems like
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
>> an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
>> "acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
>> claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
>> though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.
>>
> Yes, that bug is precisely what I am trying to fix (although your wording above is
> inverted from the problem in the bug).  What happens is that acpiphp claims the
> pcie ports, because acpiphp init runs first, and we haven't yet parsed _OSC,
> which would have told acpiphp to yield control to pciehp.  The initial fix I
> proposed fixed this by parsing _OSC prior to running the acpiphp bus scan, but
> that reintroduced the problem of not handling pcie 1.1 aspm properly.  That has
> been fixed in v2/v3 by deferring the setting of aspm_disable until after the bus
> scan.
>
> Shall I submit a v4 with an updated changelog?

No need, I'll update the changelog and include the bugzilla reference
and post it for your approval.  Thanks!

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Neil Horman - Aug. 28, 2013, 1:23 p.m.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:04:47AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:34:11PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> [+cc Stefan]
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> >> > Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
> >> > slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
> >> > uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
> >> > pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
> >> > pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
> >> > to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
> >> > devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
> >> > until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
> >> > slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.
> >>
> >> I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
> >> is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.
> >>
> >> Is this a fix for problems like
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
> >> an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
> >> "acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
> >> claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
> >> though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.
> >>
> > Yes, that bug is precisely what I am trying to fix (although your wording above is
> > inverted from the problem in the bug).  What happens is that acpiphp claims the
> > pcie ports, because acpiphp init runs first, and we haven't yet parsed _OSC,
> > which would have told acpiphp to yield control to pciehp.  The initial fix I
> > proposed fixed this by parsing _OSC prior to running the acpiphp bus scan, but
> > that reintroduced the problem of not handling pcie 1.1 aspm properly.  That has
> > been fixed in v2/v3 by deferring the setting of aspm_disable until after the bus
> > scan.
> >
> > Shall I submit a v4 with an updated changelog?
> 
> No need, I'll update the changelog and include the bugzilla reference
> and post it for your approval.  Thanks!
> 
> Bjorn
> 
Great, thanks!
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 5917839..1e80a90 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@  static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
 	u32 flags, base_flags;
 	acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
+	bool no_aspm = false;
 
 	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!root)
@@ -437,27 +438,6 @@  static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 	flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
 	acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
 
-	/*
-	 * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
-	 */
-
-	/*
-	 * Scan the Root Bridge
-	 * --------------------
-	 * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
-	 * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
-	 * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
-	 */
-	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
-	if (!root->bus) {
-		dev_err(&device->dev,
-			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
-			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
-		result = -ENODEV;
-		goto end;
-	}
-
-	/* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
 	if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
 		flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
 	if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
@@ -512,7 +492,14 @@  static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 				acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
 			dev_info(&device->dev,
 				 "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
-			pcie_no_aspm();
+			/*
+			 * We want to disable aspm here, but aspm_disabled
+			 * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
+			 * properly handle pcie 1.1 devices.  So we set this
+			 * flag here, to defer the action until after the acpi
+			 * root scan
+			 */
+			no_aspm = true;
 		}
 	} else {
 		dev_info(&device->dev,
@@ -520,6 +507,29 @@  static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
 			 "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
+	 */
+
+	/*
+	 * Scan the Root Bridge
+	 * --------------------
+	 * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
+	 * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
+	 * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
+	 */
+	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
+	if (!root->bus) {
+		dev_err(&device->dev,
+			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
+			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
+		result = -ENODEV;
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	if (no_aspm)
+		pcie_no_aspm();
+
 	pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(device, root->bus);
 	if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
 		device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, true);