Message ID | 1376606111-3518-2-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. > Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the > lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody seems to care :)
On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. >> Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the >> lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> > > > Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it > awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody > seems to care :) Ping, anyone? Not sure if any of my mails even reaches maillists :-/
On 09/17/2013 12:16 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. >>> Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the >>> lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> >> >> >> Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it >> awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody >> seems to care :) > > Ping, anyone? Not sure if any of my mails even reaches maillists :-/ Ping? It conflicts with "[PATCH] pseries: Fix loading of little endian kernels" posted today. It would be great to have either this series or the new patch upstream...
On 09/25/2013 11:01 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 09/17/2013 12:16 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>>> Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. >>>> Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the >>>> lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >>> >>> Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it >>> awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody >>> seems to care :) >> Ping, anyone? Not sure if any of my mails even reaches maillists :-/ > Ping? > > It conflicts with "[PATCH] pseries: Fix loading of little endian kernels" > posted today. It would be great to have either this series or the new patch > upstream... Andreas is going to rework it, yes :). Alex
On 10/01/2013 03:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 09/25/2013 11:01 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 09/17/2013 12:16 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> On 08/16/2013 08:35 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>>>> Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. >>>>> Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the >>>>> lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de> >>>> >>>> Out of curiosity - is anything going to happen to this series? Is it >>>> awaiting for someone's review? Just asking as it is quite old and nobody >>>> seems to care :) >>> Ping, anyone? Not sure if any of my mails even reaches maillists :-/ >> Ping? >> >> It conflicts with "[PATCH] pseries: Fix loading of little endian kernels" >> posted today. It would be great to have either this series or the new patch >> upstream... > > Andreas is going to rework it, yes :). Wheeeen? Not complaining or anything, just asking :)
diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c index 13b290c..28ca447 100644 --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c @@ -7102,6 +7102,7 @@ POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER5P)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc); PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(oc); + dc->fw_name = "PowerPC,POWER5"; dc->desc = "POWER5+"; pcc->init_proc = init_proc_power5plus; pcc->check_pow = check_pow_970FX; @@ -7212,6 +7213,7 @@ POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER7)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc); PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(oc); + dc->fw_name = "PowerPC,POWER7"; dc->desc = "POWER7"; pcc->init_proc = init_proc_POWER7; pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck; @@ -7246,6 +7248,7 @@ POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER8)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc); PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(oc); + dc->fw_name = "PowerPC,POWER8"; dc->desc = "POWER8"; pcc->init_proc = init_proc_POWER7; pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck;
Set the expected values for POWER7, POWER7+, POWER8 and POWER5+. Note that POWER5+ and POWER7+ are intentionally lacking the '+', so the lack of a POWER7P family constitutes no problem. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> --- target-ppc/translate_init.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)