diff mbox

Don't include gimple.h twice

Message ID 20130722133122.GI14359@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Marek Polacek July 22, 2013, 1:31 p.m. UTC 
I don't think there's a reason to include gimple.h twice...
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, will commit as obvious soon.

2013-07-22  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>

	* gimplify.c: Don't include gimple.h twice.


	Marek

Comments

Jeff Law July 22, 2013, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 07/22/2013 07:31 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> I don't think there's a reason to include gimple.h twice...
> Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, will commit as obvious soon.
>
> 2013-07-22  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
>
> 	* gimplify.c: Don't include gimple.h twice.
OK.
jeff
diff mbox

Patch

--- gcc/gimplify.c.mp	2013-07-22 15:29:17.202468003 +0200
+++ gcc/gimplify.c	2013-07-22 15:29:25.891502560 +0200
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@  along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
 #include "pointer-set.h"
 #include "splay-tree.h"
 #include "vec.h"
-#include "gimple.h"
 
 #include "langhooks-def.h"	/* FIXME: for lhd_set_decl_assembler_name */
 #include "tree-pass.h"		/* FIXME: only for PROP_gimple_any */