| Message ID | CAH6eHdT2eYgOuKqszZknEg-JDBVOhF28zzgMaLPLbPBqXRO=Mg@mail.gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex index f606282..39ab83a 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/shared_mutex @@ -339,7 +339,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION shared_lock& operator=(shared_lock&& __sl) noexcept - { shared_lock(std::move(__sl)).swap(*this); } + { + shared_lock(std::move(__sl)).swap(*this); + return *this; + } void lock()
Fix a stupid bug in shared_lock. Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk. * include/std/shared_mutex (shared_lock::operator=): Add missing return statement. commit b177aa326855e5e27ab53427d5a02012ffb944a4 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> Date: Sun Jun 16 21:27:55 2013 +0100 * include/std/shared_mutex (shared_lock::operator=): Add missing return statement.