Patchwork [GIT,PULL] arm-soc: Xilinx zynq clock changes for v3.11

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Michal Simek
Date May 27, 2013, 7:50 a.m.
Message ID <51A31045.1060406@monstr.eu>
Download mbox
Permalink /patch/246541/
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.11

Comments

Michal Simek - May 27, 2013, 7:50 a.m.
Hi Arnd and Olof,

please pull the following changes to your arm-soc tree.
We haven't got any response from audience or clk maintainer
but we discussed these changes with him in several threads.
The major change is to have easy to going DT clock description
in one node and do not describe the whole clock tree in details
which none uses.

Thanks,
Michal


The following changes since commit c7788792a5e7b0d5d7f96d0766b4cb6112d47d75:

  Linux 3.10-rc2 (2013-05-20 14:37:38 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.11

for you to fetch changes up to 83d6e5996a34267e4402e6365c528bddd042ddf3:

  clk: zynq: Remove deprecated clock code (2013-05-27 09:21:49 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm: Xilinx Zynq clock changes for v3.11

Change Xilinx Zynq DT clock description which
reflects logical abstraction of Zynq's clock tree.

- Refactor PLL driver
- Use new clock controller driver
- Change timer and uart drivers

----------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Brinkmann (4):
      clk: zynq: Factor out PLL driver
      clk: zynq: Add clock controller driver
      arm: zynq: Migrate platform to clock controller
      clk: zynq: Remove deprecated clock code

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/zynq-7000.txt | 123 ++++++++++++++-------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi                      |  71 ++++--------
 arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts                      |   4 -
 arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c                             |   2 +-
 drivers/clk/Makefile                                  |   2 +-
 drivers/clk/clk-zynq.c                                | 378 --------------------------------------------------------------
 drivers/clk/zynq/Makefile                             |   3 +
 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c                               | 533 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c                                | 235 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c               |  23 +++-
 drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c                    |  85 +++++++++++---
 include/linux/clk/zynq.h                              |   8 +-
 12 files changed, 972 insertions(+), 495 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-zynq.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c
Michal Simek - May 30, 2013, 11:28 a.m.
Hi guys,

can you please look at this?
The reason is that based on this we can start to send
zynq driver for review because they depend on this.

Thanks,
Michal


On 05/27/2013 09:50 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
> 
> please pull the following changes to your arm-soc tree.
> We haven't got any response from audience or clk maintainer
> but we discussed these changes with him in several threads.
> The major change is to have easy to going DT clock description
> in one node and do not describe the whole clock tree in details
> which none uses.
> 
> Thanks,
> Michal
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit c7788792a5e7b0d5d7f96d0766b4cb6112d47d75:
> 
>   Linux 3.10-rc2 (2013-05-20 14:37:38 -0700)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git tags/zynq-clk-for-3.11
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 83d6e5996a34267e4402e6365c528bddd042ddf3:
> 
>   clk: zynq: Remove deprecated clock code (2013-05-27 09:21:49 +0200)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> arm: Xilinx Zynq clock changes for v3.11
> 
> Change Xilinx Zynq DT clock description which
> reflects logical abstraction of Zynq's clock tree.
> 
> - Refactor PLL driver
> - Use new clock controller driver
> - Change timer and uart drivers
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Soren Brinkmann (4):
>       clk: zynq: Factor out PLL driver
>       clk: zynq: Add clock controller driver
>       arm: zynq: Migrate platform to clock controller
>       clk: zynq: Remove deprecated clock code
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/zynq-7000.txt | 123 ++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi                      |  71 ++++--------
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts                      |   4 -
>  arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c                             |   2 +-
>  drivers/clk/Makefile                                  |   2 +-
>  drivers/clk/clk-zynq.c                                | 378 --------------------------------------------------------------
>  drivers/clk/zynq/Makefile                             |   3 +
>  drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c                               | 533 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c                                | 235 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c               |  23 +++-
>  drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c                    |  85 +++++++++++---
>  include/linux/clk/zynq.h                              |   8 +-
>  12 files changed, 972 insertions(+), 495 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk-zynq.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/zynq/pll.c
>
Olof Johansson - June 1, 2013, 5:19 a.m.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:50:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Arnd and Olof,
> 
> please pull the following changes to your arm-soc tree.
> We haven't got any response from audience or clk maintainer
> but we discussed these changes with him in several threads.
> The major change is to have easy to going DT clock description
> in one node and do not describe the whole clock tree in details
> which none uses.

Hi,

I don't see any acks from Mike Turquette on any of these. Mike?


-Olof
Olof Johansson - June 1, 2013, 5:19 a.m.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:28:37PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> can you please look at this?
> The reason is that based on this we can start to send
> zynq driver for review because they depend on this.
> 

Sorry, haven't done many merges these week. See comment on the original
request though.


-Olof
Mike Turquette - June 1, 2013, 11:47 p.m.
Quoting Olof Johansson (2013-05-31 22:19:13)
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:50:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Arnd and Olof,
> > 
> > please pull the following changes to your arm-soc tree.
> > We haven't got any response from audience or clk maintainer
> > but we discussed these changes with him in several threads.
> > The major change is to have easy to going DT clock description
> > in one node and do not describe the whole clock tree in details
> > which none uses.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't see any acks from Mike Turquette on any of these. Mike?
> 

I Acked it but they were never applied since my Ack came after the pull
request had been sent:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1499697

Regards,
Mike

> 
> -Olof
Michal Simek - June 3, 2013, 7:49 a.m.
On 06/02/2013 01:47 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Olof Johansson (2013-05-31 22:19:13)
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 09:50:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd and Olof,
>>>
>>> please pull the following changes to your arm-soc tree.
>>> We haven't got any response from audience or clk maintainer
>>> but we discussed these changes with him in several threads.
>>> The major change is to have easy to going DT clock description
>>> in one node and do not describe the whole clock tree in details
>>> which none uses.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't see any acks from Mike Turquette on any of these. Mike?
>>
> 
> I Acked it but they were never applied since my Ack came after the pull
> request had been sent:
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1499697

Yep. I can look how time went but I wait at least week for any reaction.
Mike was probably out that's why I have added patches to the branch
and sent pull request and then Mike sent his ACK.
If you like I can add Mike's ack to that patches and send you new pull
request.

Thanks,
Michal