[wwwdocs] gcc-4.8/changes.html: mention IRA and transactional memory
diff mbox

Message ID 51966E85.5010808@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Aldy Hernandez May 17, 2013, 5:53 p.m. UTC
Errr, how did we miss this?  Ok, I'm partly to blame for the lack of 
transactional memory in changes.html, but something as big as getting 
rid of reload?!

Would it be preferable to mention IRA in the target specific x86 section 
instead?  I figured it was an important enough change to warrant 
front-page coverage.

Is this OK?

diff mbox

Index: htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -r1.116 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html	24 Apr 2013 15:14:26 -0000	1.116
+++ htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html	17 May 2013 17:49:19 -0000
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ 
 	<code>-fsanitize=thread</code>. Instructions will be instrumented to
 	detect data races. The ThreadSanitizer is available on x86-64
+    <li>A new local register allocator has been implemented, which
+    replaces the 26 year old reload pass and improves generated code
+    quality on ia32 and x86-64 targets.</li>
+    <li>Support for transactional memory has been implemented on
+    selected architectures.</li>