| Message ID | 1367495531-19470-1-git-send-email-mugunthanvnm@ti.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Delegated to: | David Miller |
| Headers | show |
* Mugunthan V N | 2013-05-02 17:22:11 [+0530]: >In CPSW NAPI, after processing all interrupts IRQ is enabled and then book >keeping irq_enabled is updated. In random cases when a packet is transmitted >or received between processing packets and IRQ enabled, then just after >enabled IRQ and before irq_enabled is updated, ISR is called so IRQs are >not disabled as irq_enabled is still false and CPU gets locked in CPSW ISR. > >By changing the sequence as update the irq_enabled and then enable IRQ >fixes the issue. This issue is not captured always as it is a timing issue >whether Tx or Rx IRQ is invoked between packet processing and enable IRQ. Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:22:11 +0530 > In CPSW NAPI, after processing all interrupts IRQ is enabled and then book > keeping irq_enabled is updated. In random cases when a packet is transmitted > or received between processing packets and IRQ enabled, then just after > enabled IRQ and before irq_enabled is updated, ISR is called so IRQs are > not disabled as irq_enabled is still false and CPU gets locked in CPSW ISR. > > By changing the sequence as update the irq_enabled and then enable IRQ > fixes the issue. This issue is not captured always as it is a timing issue > whether Tx or Rx IRQ is invoked between packet processing and enable IRQ. > > Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 59c4391..21a5b29 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -555,8 +555,8 @@ static int cpsw_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) cpdma_ctlr_eoi(priv->dma, CPDMA_EOI_RX); prim_cpsw = cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, 0); if (prim_cpsw->irq_enabled == false) { - cpsw_enable_irq(priv); prim_cpsw->irq_enabled = true; + cpsw_enable_irq(priv); } }
In CPSW NAPI, after processing all interrupts IRQ is enabled and then book keeping irq_enabled is updated. In random cases when a packet is transmitted or received between processing packets and IRQ enabled, then just after enabled IRQ and before irq_enabled is updated, ISR is called so IRQs are not disabled as irq_enabled is still false and CPU gets locked in CPSW ISR. By changing the sequence as update the irq_enabled and then enable IRQ fixes the issue. This issue is not captured always as it is a timing issue whether Tx or Rx IRQ is invoked between packet processing and enable IRQ. Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)