diff mbox

[08/14] netlink: implement memory mapped sendmsg()

Message ID 1366217229-22705-9-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Patrick McHardy April 17, 2013, 4:47 p.m. UTC
Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
falls back to copying.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Ben Hutchings April 17, 2013, 10:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> falls back to copying.
[...]

Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?

Ben.
Patrick McHardy April 18, 2013, 10:31 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:57:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> > received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> > can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> > only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> > must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> > falls back to copying.
> [...]
> 
> Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?

I don't know, there's no copy_to_process() function is the tree I'm using.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Ben Hutchings April 18, 2013, 4:26 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 12:31 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:57:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> > > received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> > > can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> > > only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> > > must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> > > falls back to copying.
> > [...]
> > 
> > Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?
> 
> I don't know, there's no copy_to_process() function is the tree I'm using.

Sorry, I mean process_vm_writev().  copy_to_process() was the name in an
earlier version of CMA.

Ben.
Patrick McHardy April 19, 2013, 11:04 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 05:26:26PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 12:31 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:57:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > > Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> > > > received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> > > > can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> > > > only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> > > > must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> > > > falls back to copying.
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?
> > 
> > I don't know, there's no copy_to_process() function is the tree I'm using.
> 
> Sorry, I mean process_vm_writev().  copy_to_process() was the name in an
> earlier version of CMA.

I'm not sure whether process_vm_writev() allows to write to a memory mapped
area and, if so, whether it would invoke vm_ops->open() before doing so.

I'm looking into that, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 6560635..90504a0 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -116,6 +116,11 @@  static bool netlink_skb_is_mmaped(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return NETLINK_CB(skb).flags & NETLINK_SKB_MMAPED;
 }
 
+static bool netlink_tx_is_mmaped(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return nlk_sk(sk)->tx_ring.pg_vec != NULL;
+}
+
 static __pure struct page *pgvec_to_page(const void *addr)
 {
 	if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
@@ -438,6 +443,9 @@  static unsigned int netlink_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
 	struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
 	unsigned int mask;
 
+	if (nlk->cb != NULL && nlk->rx_ring.pg_vec != NULL)
+		netlink_dump(sk);
+
 	mask = datagram_poll(file, sock, wait);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
@@ -483,10 +491,110 @@  static void netlink_ring_setup_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
 	NETLINK_CB(skb).flags |= NETLINK_SKB_MMAPED;
 	NETLINK_CB(skb).sk = sk;
 }
+
+static int netlink_mmap_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				u32 dst_portid, u32 dst_group,
+				struct sock_iocb *siocb)
+{
+	struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+	struct netlink_ring *ring;
+	struct nl_mmap_hdr *hdr;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	unsigned int maxlen;
+	bool excl = true;
+	int err = 0, len = 0;
+
+	/* Netlink messages are validated by the receiver before processing.
+	 * In order to avoid userspace changing the contents of the message
+	 * after validation, the socket and the ring may only be used by a
+	 * single process, otherwise we fall back to copying.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_long_read(&sk->sk_socket->file->f_count) > 2 ||
+	    atomic_read(&nlk->mapped) > 1)
+		excl = false;
+
+	mutex_lock(&nlk->pg_vec_lock);
+
+	ring   = &nlk->tx_ring;
+	maxlen = ring->frame_size - NL_MMAP_HDRLEN;
+
+	do {
+		hdr = netlink_current_frame(ring, NL_MMAP_STATUS_VALID);
+		if (hdr == NULL) {
+			if (!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) &&
+			    atomic_read(&nlk->tx_ring.pending))
+				schedule();
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (hdr->nm_len > maxlen) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		netlink_frame_flush_dcache(hdr);
+
+		if (likely(dst_portid == 0 && dst_group == 0 && excl)) {
+			skb = alloc_skb_head(GFP_KERNEL);
+			if (skb == NULL) {
+				err = -ENOBUFS;
+				goto out;
+			}
+			sock_hold(sk);
+			netlink_ring_setup_skb(skb, sk, ring, hdr);
+			NETLINK_CB(skb).flags |= NETLINK_SKB_TX;
+			__skb_put(skb, hdr->nm_len);
+			netlink_set_status(hdr, NL_MMAP_STATUS_RESERVED);
+			atomic_inc(&ring->pending);
+		} else {
+			skb = alloc_skb(hdr->nm_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+			if (skb == NULL) {
+				err = -ENOBUFS;
+				goto out;
+			}
+			__skb_put(skb, hdr->nm_len);
+			memcpy(skb->data, (void *)hdr + NL_MMAP_HDRLEN, hdr->nm_len);
+			netlink_set_status(hdr, NL_MMAP_STATUS_UNUSED);
+		}
+
+		netlink_increment_head(ring);
+
+		NETLINK_CB(skb).portid	  = nlk->portid;
+		NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = dst_group;
+		NETLINK_CB(skb).creds	  = siocb->scm->creds;
+
+		err = security_netlink_send(sk, skb);
+		if (err) {
+			kfree_skb(skb);
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		if (unlikely(dst_group)) {
+			atomic_inc(&skb->users);
+			netlink_broadcast(sk, skb, dst_portid, dst_group,
+					  GFP_KERNEL);
+		}
+		err = netlink_unicast(sk, skb, dst_portid,
+				      msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+		if (err < 0)
+			goto out;
+		len += err;
+
+	} while (hdr != NULL ||
+		 (!(msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) &&
+		  atomic_read(&nlk->tx_ring.pending)));
+
+	if (len > 0)
+		err = len;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&nlk->pg_vec_lock);
+	return err;
+}
 #else /* CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP */
 #define netlink_skb_is_mmaped(skb)	false
+#define netlink_tx_is_mmaped(sk)	false
 #define netlink_mmap			sock_no_mmap
 #define netlink_poll			datagram_poll
+#define netlink_mmap_sendmsg(sk, msg, dst_portid, dst_group, siocb)	0
 #endif /* CONFIG_NETLINK_MMAP */
 
 static void netlink_destroy_callback(struct netlink_callback *cb)
@@ -517,11 +625,16 @@  static void netlink_skb_destructor(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		hdr = netlink_mmap_hdr(skb);
 		sk = NETLINK_CB(skb).sk;
 
-		if (!(NETLINK_CB(skb).flags & NETLINK_SKB_DELIVERED)) {
-			hdr->nm_len = 0;
-			netlink_set_status(hdr, NL_MMAP_STATUS_VALID);
+		if (NETLINK_CB(skb).flags & NETLINK_SKB_TX) {
+			netlink_set_status(hdr, NL_MMAP_STATUS_UNUSED);
+			ring = &nlk_sk(sk)->tx_ring;
+		} else {
+			if (!(NETLINK_CB(skb).flags & NETLINK_SKB_DELIVERED)) {
+				hdr->nm_len = 0;
+				netlink_set_status(hdr, NL_MMAP_STATUS_VALID);
+			}
+			ring = &nlk_sk(sk)->rx_ring;
 		}
-		ring = &nlk_sk(sk)->rx_ring;
 
 		WARN_ON(atomic_read(&ring->pending) == 0);
 		atomic_dec(&ring->pending);
@@ -1230,8 +1343,9 @@  int netlink_attachskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
 
-	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf ||
-	    test_bit(NETLINK_CONGESTED, &nlk->state)) {
+	if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk->sk_rcvbuf ||
+	     test_bit(NETLINK_CONGESTED, &nlk->state)) &&
+	    !netlink_skb_is_mmaped(skb)) {
 		DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
 		if (!*timeo) {
 			if (!ssk || netlink_is_kernel(ssk))
@@ -1291,6 +1405,8 @@  static struct sk_buff *netlink_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, gfp_t allocation)
 	int delta;
 
 	WARN_ON(skb->sk != NULL);
+	if (netlink_skb_is_mmaped(skb))
+		return skb;
 
 	delta = skb->end - skb->tail;
 	if (delta * 2 < skb->truesize)
@@ -1815,6 +1931,13 @@  static int netlink_sendmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct socket *sock,
 			goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (netlink_tx_is_mmaped(sk) &&
+	    msg->msg_iov->iov_base == NULL) {
+		err = netlink_mmap_sendmsg(sk, msg, dst_portid, dst_group,
+					   siocb);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	err = -EMSGSIZE;
 	if (len > sk->sk_sndbuf - 32)
 		goto out;